491
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca to c/upliftingnews@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/20749204

Another positive step in the right direction for an organization rife with brokenness. There's a lot I don't like about the organization, but this is something a love--a scouting organization open to young women and the lgbtq community. The next step is being inclusive of nonreligious agnostic and atheist youth and leaders. As well as ending the cultural appropriation of Native American peoples.

May this organization continue to build up youth, never allow further violence against youth, and make amends for all the wrongs. There's a lot of good that comes out of organizations like this and I won't discount it even though it's riddled with a dark history.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago

It's a pity that I'm still ineligible to work with the Scouts. I have a lot of happy memories from my decade in Scouting, and still have a significant interest in many of the things that I did while I was in the organization. Unfortunately, my religion is, shall we say, disfavored within Scouting, and is not permitted for either youth or leaders.

[-] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Religion, while required, plays a very minor role practically speaking. Even your "disfavored" beliefs should be permitted.

My "belief" in my own imaginary mythos is enough to satiate the non-sectarian requirements thus far. I simply don't speak about it any detail.

This thread has reminded me that talking to my kids about this is important because my eldest, practically speaking, is agnostic. I don't want them to feel uncomfortable lying for Eagle, so I want to share some options. There's a lot of ways for a scout to be reverent without actually believing in a deity.

Here's a little more on the requirement: https://blog.scoutingmagazine.org/2014/10/03/belief-in-god-scouting/

I can't wait until this "integral" part of the program is made a thing of the past.

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago

I am a Satanist; although it's religious, it's also explicitly atheistic. Per your blog, "By signing the membership application, each leader has already acknowledged the Declaration of Religious Principle which affirms a belief in God [...]". While I could quite truthfully say that I acknowledge myself as my own god, I do not believe in God, and I can not honestly affirm that I believe a belief in any external god to be necessary in order to be a good person and citizen.

"A scout is trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and reverent"; I can't be trustworthy without also being wholly honest, including that I don't believe in an external god. "On my honor, I will do my best, to god and my country, to uphold the Scout law, and to keep myself physically strong, mentally awake, and morally straight"; how could I say this without being deceptive? I know that the 'god' they're referring to is a deity outside of myself, and it wouldn't be moral for me to swear to this without also believing in some form of external deity.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 5 months ago

I know that the 'god' they're referring to is a deity outside of myself

That is false. They are very explicit in their policies that they do not define "god". Their policies leave the definition of "god" to be determined by the scout, not the scouting organization.

The "duty to god" requirement charges you with defining your own god. You are not beholden to anyone else's definition.

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

They do not define god, but they do constantly refer to God (capital G), and a requirement for faith. Faith ends up being extremely hard to define, but from the context in which it is used here, it strongly implies that faith requires a belief in an external deity.

The simple way to answer this question would be to simply ask; I can write to the Scout board, say that I'm an Eagle Scout--which is true--that I've had a change of faith since I was in Scouting, and that I now identify as an atheistic Satanist, and ask if I am eligible to work in adult leadership roles. Which I am doing right now.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 5 months ago

Your link is to a site hosted by andividual scouter. It is not the policy of the organization.

Faith ends up being extremely hard to define

Correct. Which is why the organization does not actually define it. They explicitly state that it is to be defined by the scout and the scout's family.

I, too, am an atheist, by the usual definition of the term: I believe in no supernatural deities. However, with BSA's definition, "atheism" is only possible if I believe in nothing whatsoever. Some extreme form of nihilism. With BSA's definition, I do, indeed, have a "god": my own consciousness. I do, indeed, have a "religious" creed: logic, rationality, the pursuit of understanding reality. I wouldn't normally refer to these as "god" or "religion", but they serve the same purposes for me that gods and religions serve to theists.

and ask if I am eligible

That is not a question they can answer. They charge you with defining your "god". You are the authority on the subject, not them.

If asked how I fulfill my "duty to God", I would respond that within my worldview, the concept that BSA refers to as "god" is more commonly described as "consciousness". I might mention that within my worldview, it is considered "impolite" and "imprecise" to refer to consciousness as "god", but that I recognize there is no malicious intent behind the BSA usage of the term. If I got any pushback on that, I would remind the inquisitor that my family and I are charged with defining God and religion. I would further remind them that a scout is reverent, and reverent includes tolerance and respect of the beliefs of others.

I would explain that I fulfill my duty by experiencing, learning, teaching. I would describe a memorable experience, what I learned from that experience, and thank the inquisitor for giving me the opportunity to fulfill my "religious" duty by sharing the knowledge I had gleaned.

If I recall correctly, (it's hard to look at previous messages with this app), you said you could truthfully describe yourself as your own god. Do you exist? If you exist and you can describe yourself as your own god, is it still reasonable to call yourself an atheist?

If you are your own god, what duty do you have to yourself? Are you fulfilling that duty? Are you reverent? If you can answer those questions (and it doesn't really matter what the answers are), you are eligible to be a scout.

[-] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

I hear you and applaud the conviction.

I feel very okay acknowledging myself as my own god and yourself as yours. It's certainly a reinterpretation, but I'm okay with that for the sake of offering this to my own children. Children hardly know what it means to believe in a god as it is, so I figure why complicate it. I love to teach them what it means to be reverent in a way that is different from the status quo.

In the end though, my preference is that atheists are permitted as they are. Period. Full stop.

We can teach reverence without an external deity.

[-] Rozz 1 points 5 months ago

Also while it may be true in some parts of the country, I cannot imagine the other volunteers will ban you for something as semantic as the "wrong" religion or a different definition of reverence.

[-] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

When your religion is defined by denial and opposition to all other religions, then it probably isn't welcome where religious tolerance is a requirement.

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

Sorry, are you talking about Christianity?

Or were you talking about Islam?

Oh, wait, no, probably Hinduism.

[-] CompN12@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 5 months ago

Nah, surely Mormonism.

[-] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

No I mean the literal purpose of Satanism is to oppose religion and particularly Christianity. That's why it's named after the embodiment of evil according to Christianity. It's deliberately antagonistic. That's not at all the same as believing that yours is the only true religion.

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Goodness. You don't really know a lot about Satanism, do you?

I don't oppose religion, as long as religion stays in it's own lane. As long as religion is personal, and not forced on other people, I simply don't care; it's literally not my problem, nor is it my job to 'convert' other people. If you're happy being e.g. Catholic, that's fine.

...Until you try to force me to obey the dictates of your religion because you can't tell the difference between civil society and your religion.

[-] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

Look, it doesn't matter what you claim to be about if the name you choose is screaming something different. It's like if you opened a restaurant called Hitler was right, and then acted surprised when people called you a Nazi. You can tell everyone that Jews are welcome, but nobody will believe you.

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

::sigh::

So you tell me, since you know my religion so well; what do I believe?

[-] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

The only thing I know about your religion is that it is antagonistic toward Christianity, and probably all other religions. And that's based entirely on the name.

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

Uh huh.

Would you judge a man based on the color of his skin rather than on his character?

[-] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Uhh no? But if he chose a name for himself, I would assume that the name meant something about him.

[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

So, to recap, you know nothing about my religion other than the name, and make assumptions about what I believe due to your prejudices, but you don't believe that you have prejudices based on skin color. Is that correct?

[-] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

Yes, if your religion is named after the literal anti-Christ, I assume that you are anti Christian. And I don't see what that has to do with skin color.

[-] papertowels@lemmy.one 3 points 5 months ago

I had no idea this was a thing. Thanks for sharing...

this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
491 points (89.2% liked)

Uplifting News

11288 readers
501 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS