159
not a moral pr(ul)ecept (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by emstuff@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

sorry i got my rhetoric ™️ wrong last time i am just attempting to illustrate the thesis of Tolerance is not a moral precept by Yonatan Zunger so check that out if ur curious thanks babes <3

[Tolerance] is an agreement to live in peace, not an agreement to be peaceful no matter the conduct of others. A peace treaty is not a suicide pact.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That is equally vague. What constitutes harm?

Any action or inaction that physically, financially, or mentally damages another human being through malice or negligence.

who defines what harm is?

In a democracy? The people.

Belief happens in the mind. We don’t want to go down the road or thought crimes.

If you believe hurting a group of people, for any reason, is righteous you're more likely to commit crimes against that group. If we're going to start talking about slippery slopes, let's talk about the slippery slope of allowing hate to take root and spread in any society and how that's turned out in the past.

this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
159 points (100.0% liked)

196

16414 readers
1653 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS