472
submitted 2 months ago by Xatolos@reddthat.com to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 222 points 2 months ago

I mean... Good? Shouldn't that be the goal, electricity at no cost to the people?

[-] TOModera@lemmy.world 106 points 2 months ago

Won't someone think of the poor capitalists who can't love better lives then those around them!

/s, just in case.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Well in a very basic way, more solar than we can use means there is waste. Too many panels produced and installed. And if solar generation capacity is going to waste, that means Germany doesn’t have enough storage to keep it in, and that’s a problem. And who knows what negative energy prices will do to the other power producers who back up solar (which, you know, doesn’t produce at night). That would be a problem. So there is a little more to this than just the headline. Also, Reddit needs to learn that business stories are written for investors and business readers and they don’t frame everything in terms of broad human interest.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

No such thing as too many solar panels, only not enough storage.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

There’s no upper limit on either really. But why would you ever install more than you can store? That’s still waste. Solar panels have nonzero cost and environmental impact.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

It is in some cases economical to install way too many solar panels, because production is variable. If you install enough for 100% production on a sunny day, then on a cloudy day you only have 70% of what you need. So instead you install 150% of what you need, so you never go below 100%.

Then the question is what to do with the excess during sunny days. Storage didn't used to be a problem because early solar adapters could sell it to other parts of the grid who are still using fossil fuels, and fossil fuel production plants can ramp down as needed (natural gas especially).

It's only now that renewables are becoming such a large portion of the grid that it's getting difficult to ramp the remaining fossil fuels down and up fast enough that we need to look into storage. Current storage options are extremely expensive though, similar in cost to a solar panel installation (at least on the residential side).

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

It costs something to build and maintain the infrastructure to distribute power. Typically that cost is recovered through payments for the generation of the power, which becomes a problem if generation costs get too low. It suggests that we should probably consider a different model of paying for that infrastructure now that the reality of generation has changed.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Oh well. I guess they will just have to municipalize the grid.

this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
472 points (92.3% liked)

World News

38147 readers
2335 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS