[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Plus it is recycled. They would only replace what is lost due to evaporation or after a drain and cleaning.

659
[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Well, my opinion is that: 1. It is largely a popularity contest and Trump is still insanely popular with his crowd and Biden is not popular in general 2. The Maga crowd will certainly vote, so the Democrats would need to be united and show up to beat that. With any real doubt about Biden, I think a large enough to matter amount of Dems will either not vote or vote for other.

[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

We are in a damned if you do damned if you don't situation. Three months ago I would have said Biden would most likely win by a very slim margin again. Now I would say there is a real chance for it to go the other way. However, replace him, and like you said that person is also very unlikely to win at this point.

[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago

What is the temperature in Barcelona right now? I would imagine getting hit with a water gun would feel pretty nice on a hot day of walking around doing touristy stuff.

[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

She looks like this guy with a clipped on face. Such a ghoul inside and out.

[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

I do. The same thing we have been doing with it this entire time storing it in underground bunkers. Unlike the propaganda, the waste from nuclear is rather small and unlike pollution from fossil fuel plants, it is easily contained however much longer living. The benefit still out weigh the cost of managing disposal. The reality is that there is plenty of uninhabited land on the planet where nuclear waste can be stored and isolated for thousands of years. One day, hopefully, we will have fusion power which won't generate waste. And perhaps, someday we will also figure out how to permanently disposal of the nuclear waste. In the mean time, storage is a fine solution that far out weighs polluting the atmosphere with burning things.

[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago

See, now I didn't say anything about eugenics for the poor or dumb. I just said I supported the idea of eugenics. I would be very happy to start with the wealthy and powerful first. (Although one might make a good argument that there is a significant overlap between the rich and the dumb)

[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago

Well, watching the world burn and 8 billion people contributing to that, I can get behind some eugenics.

[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

If all fossil fuel power plants were converted to nuclear then tech power consumption wouldn't even matter. Again, it was the oil industry that railroaded nuclear power as being unsafe.

[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

Looks like somebody is itching to be a dictator.

[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 222 points 1 month ago

I mean... Good? Shouldn't that be the goal, electricity at no cost to the people?

[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 228 points 3 months ago

Oh, buddy. Everyone laughs at you all the time. That time was just to you face.

view more: next ›

CompostMaterial

joined 1 year ago