126
Lemmy.ml tankie censorship problem - Lemmy.World
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
126 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15918 readers
3 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
So funny how braindead liberals truly are in the age of the internet and 60+ years of historical analysis and declassified info we have now that wasn't available back then. What do you even call an ideology where you can determine that
Nuking civilians with atom bombs multiple times: Good
Banning me from a fringe forum because I'm ideologically opposed to you: Bad
You're right you're right, liberals I'm so fucking sorry. I don't know how in my warped little authoritarian mind I convinced myself that banning you specifically on the internet is morally superior to nuclear hellfire wiping out entire bloodlines. Please forgive me for the love of god
I think that's a bit reductionist. Their argument was more "I stumbled into an instance that had vastly different views, but I'm from reddit so I only looked at the comm" or something.