602
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 19 points 1 month ago

In theory a modern artist, writer, musician, etc could become a billionaire from direct to customer sales, but I'll believe it when it happens.

[-] RampageDon@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Isn't Taylor Swift a billionaire? That is about the extent of my knowledge of her though.

[-] Palerider@feddit.uk 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Wasn't Taylor Swift born into a wealthy family? That's why she could take the time and chances to become a pop star. Not that I'm saying she isn't talented, she obviously is, but a lot of talented poor kids don't get that opportunity.

[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah. But I wonder if she’s the first billionaire off actual performance and content sales.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 13 points 1 month ago

Kanye supposedly was before he lost all his endorsements for openly being a Nazi. Artists dont actually own any means of production so they can very quickly lose everything.

[-] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 7 points 1 month ago

Some do. Some, like Shaq or Ryan Reynolds (or Kanye) use their money to invest in other companies. Ryan Reynolds coming out and saying Nazi shit would probably be bad for Mint, just like Ye's controversy was bad for Yeezy, just like Elon's controversy is bad for Tesla.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago

Kanye lost about 2/3rds of his net worth over night because Nike dropped the Yeezy brand. Being a partial owner of a niche brand is in no way comparable to someone like Musk who has controling interest in multiple market leading companies. Celebrity status can be leveraged to get a minority stake in a company, but minority owners can be forced out just as easily.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Reynolds sold Mint. They are now owned by one of the big 2

[-] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I think Paul McCartney was

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Even them are profitting off the work of hundreds of people. Or rather, a publisher is profitting off of their work along with the work of a lot more people.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

Direct to customer meaning they sell direct to a customer. Presumably through digital copies and owning a server rack.

You can certainly argue that even that kind of hypothetical billionaire shouldn't exist, and you'd be right.

[-] everyone_said@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

As much as I dislike her and her views, J.K. Rowling would be an example wouldn't she?

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nah. Tons of merchandising, films, publishing etc.

Those Quidditch brooms and plastic wands don't assemble themselves in a sweatshop.

Think more like if some self hosted webnovel had the same success somehow, or if she'd been as involved with checking the conditions of the merchandise empire as thoroughly as she was apparently involved in making sure the child actors were treated well. Not particularly likely, but hypothetically.

[-] everyone_said@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Why do the merchandise sales not count? Are they not a product of her creative writing? Many webnovelists sell merch. One of my favourite webnovelists semi-recently hired an editor, would that disqualify them?

I'm a little confused on how you are defining the conditions. If the artist can only count their personal contributions than I don't think it is possible in any sense. No person no matter how hard working or talented can personally generate a billion in profit.

[-] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

because made by "slaves" (low-paid workers), so the income becomes "dirty", the entire point of this post.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago

Add single use garbage like party favors too, which pollute the earth to the list.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 4 points 1 month ago

"by being honest"

this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
602 points (99.3% liked)

World News

38126 readers
2749 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS