65
submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Polling earlier this month placed Boebert with a 35-point lead over five other candidates, though 40% of voters were undecided at the time, according to the Kaplan Strategies poll.

What the fuck? Her new district sees a carpetbagging moron who has successfully passed zero bills, came within a cunt hair of losing a safe R seat to a Democrat because she's an embarrassment to Colorado, then went on and became a national embarrassment after going to second base with her boyfriend at a Bettlejuice play, was basically run out of her own district, and collectively said "Yeah, we want more of that!"?

We really are in the stupidest timeline. I will never forgive Trump for a lot of things, but especially for opening the door and allowing people like her and MTG to rise to power.

[-] Veedem@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

It's wild how one single guy pretty much opened the flood gates for brazen stupidity to be a brand instead of an embarrassment.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Sarah "I can see Russia from my house" Palin would like a word

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

To be fair, they were building up to it for a very long time. Like everything else, donnie just slaps his name on other people's work.

Assholes like Murdoch, Ailes, Limbaugh - and all his imitators on hate radio, the Koch Brothers, Alex Jones, Newt Gingrich, the Blessed Saint Ronnie Raygun himself (PBUH), etc....have been working to dismantle any semblance of sanity, reasonableness, and consensus reality for decade upon decade.

The arrival of someone like donnie is just the latest and most visible symptom of this conservative rot.

[-] anon6789@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Polling earlier this month placed Boebert with a 35-point lead over five other candidates, though 40% of voters were undecided at the time

And going deeper than that, the 35 point lead is only above the other R candidates, so I'm thinking this is a name recognition thing, but I'm not very familiar with the politics of rural Colorado.

Also, of the 40% of undecideds, they asked them if they'd even consider voting for her and 60% of them said no.

The latest from 538 has the D candidate ahead of her 41% to 27% for Bobbert.

I recommend you check out the full poll results here. There are many more insights into CO Republicans. It's all graphs, so it's not dry reading, just the good stuff.

45% say Trumps's conviction makes them "Much more likely" to vote for him and 33% say it has made no change to their plans to vote.

71% say hell no to taking Palestinian refugees into the US.

41% say immigration has ruined their town.

It's 28 questions in all.

[-] juice702@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Eastern CO is way more red and ass-backwards than the western slope. Dumbass prairie yokels not smart enough to vote smarter.

[-] runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 months ago

I (unfortunately) live in this district, so heres my local insight/opinions. The incumbent for the district, Ken Buck, stepped down in March, so it's all "new" challengers, 3 of which have been involved in state/local politics. The district has been Red since 2008. As another poster shared, 538 polling shows her losing to 2 of the three Dems running in the primary. Most of east rural Colorado is more '90s conservatives than tea party/MAGA conservatives, so they are likely to stay home and not vote for Boebert.

Lines were redrawn after 2022 election which caused Boeberts current district to become more blue, and I think Adam Frisch has a good chance of winning, which means boebert has a shot at flipping two districts from red to blue. 538 doesn't have any polling data for district 3 yet so this may just be a Lefty's dream.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Adam Frisch has a good chance of winning, which means boebert has a shot at flipping two districts from red to blue.

What a glorious outcome this would be. After a short but pointless career, she's essentially run out of politics and goes down in history as the first person to cost their party not just one but two seats on her way out.

I would celebrate with a hearty chuckle.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

....Palin and Michele Bachmann enter the chat....

Anyway, these people are just a cult at this point. They look at a complete dumbass like Bobo, giving handjobs in public, and think she's "owning the libs", when all she is to normal Americans is a complete fucking joke and total assclown.

[-] Warp10Lizard@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago

Palin was my exit from the party. I was too young and influenced to realize Bush was a goober, but after Palin opened her mouth years later, I made the Seinfeld theater exit and haven't looked back. That was a slippery slope and they went straight Slip 'N Slide down it.

this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
65 points (88.2% liked)

politics

19148 readers
2971 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS