242
submitted 1 month ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

One House Democrat said he spoke for others in the wake of the president’s stunningly feeble debate performance on Thursday: “The movement to convince Biden to not run is real.”

The House member, an outspoken defender of the president, said that House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer should consider “a combined effort” to nudge President Joe Biden out of the race.

Crestfallen by the president’s weak voice, pallid appearance and meandering answers, numerous Democratic officials said Biden’s bet on an early debate to rebut unceasing questions about his age had not only backfired but done damage that may prove irreversible. The president had, in the first 30 minutes of the debate, fully affirmed doubts about his fitness.

A second House Democrat said “reflection is needed” from Biden about the way ahead and indicated the private text threads among lawmakers were even more dire, with some saying outright that the president needed to drop out of the race.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Xyre@lemmus.org 55 points 1 month ago

This is how Bernie can still win! /s

In the off chance they do replace him, they're going to force the worst possible candidate on us (Kamala?). Because what else are you going to do, let the bad guy win?

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 14 points 1 month ago
[-] bobburger@fedia.io 27 points 1 month ago

Newsome would have to resign as Governor and I'm not sure he wants to do that for a long shot presidential campaign.

Newsome polls very poorly against Trump and he also isn't very popular in his home state as Governor.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

At that level, Kamala is hated by her home state as well.

[-] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

Not worth the risk to lose his governorship for a shot in the dark. I don't know why the Democrat Party hasn't been building alternatives for the last 4 years. Hell, I only recall seeing Harris when she was yelling at poor immigrants to stay away. They failed this country.

[-] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Jesus fuck no. He's basically Hillary 2.0

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 1 month ago

and joe biden isnt? lateral move

[-] Xyre@lemmus.org 0 points 1 month ago

It feels like he's inevitable at this point. 🙁

[-] nickwitha_k 10 points 1 month ago

I really hope not. He is as corpo as it gets, shielding PGE from actual consequences.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Which honestly, he needs corpo support to get nominated and elected, since this is an oligarchy.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

Why would Kamala be the worst candidate?

[-] Xyre@lemmus.org 40 points 1 month ago

A bland and unprincipled candidate whose positions shift based on polling numbers. Not to mention her prosecutorial background and close proximity to SF corruption scandals makes her an easy target.

[-] ganksy@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

She's not worse than Biden but not great. He should have chosen Stacey Abrams.

[-] Aphelion@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

Her history as a prosecutor in California makes her significantly worse. She's personally locked up a lot of POC for drug possession.

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

She seems vague and even incoherent a lot of the time, I'm not so sure she's better.

[-] ganksy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago
[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago
[-] ganksy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Yeah hard sell on the whiney voice too

[-] Xyre@lemmus.org 4 points 1 month ago

I think Tammy Duckworth would've been a good choice.

[-] ganksy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

She would have been such a great choice. Completely unassailable from all sides and sharp as a tack.

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 month ago

Everyone hates her for very good reasons.

There is a reason California didn't vote for her.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Why do people just go on the internet and tell lies like this? California elected her attorney general for 8 years and senator once.

[-] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

They might be talking about her primary run for President specifically, but she had dropped out way before then I'm pretty sure. That is, I am not sure if California even had a chance to vote for her. It's one of the parts that suck about US primaries and being in a late state. Sometimes you don't even get a chance to vote for the person you wanted to vote for before they drop out.

[-] lemmeout@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

What are those very good reasons? I really don't know.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Her background is as a "tough on crime" (read: shitty on civil rights) prosecuting attorney.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

She was incredibly unpopular when she ran in the primary. Her campaign failed well before Biden was the heir apparent.

[-] hightrix@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Running Kamala would be making the same mistake they made back in 2016. She is polarizing, and extremely unlikeable. Anyone that worked with her or her department when she was in law in CA has nothing but bad things to say about her.

Running Kamala would be giving Trump a second term.

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

She’s not white and female, those reasons alone mean she’s lost over a quarter of the nation.

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That portion of the country wouldn't vote for any Democrat anyways.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
242 points (83.6% liked)

News

22470 readers
4702 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS