958
submitted 5 months ago by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] capital@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

There is absolutely an issue with first past the post voting systems. And frankly I think you know what the problems are.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That people are so desperate to keep it in place.

FTFP is never going go away if you keep voting for it lol.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

How surprising. A comment meant to discourage voting.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

Vote for something different than the ftfp parties.

[-] pingveno@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

That's not how it works. As long as FPTP exists, it will lock us into two parties. We have had multiple party systems that all demonstrated this principle. Some places are experimenting with alternatives on the state and local level, but it will take time.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

You’ve already got one response to this which is correct. I want to add to it to help explain how FPTP voting systems result in a 2 party system and simply voting for another party does not solve the issue.

But first you’re either aware of the problem and want to encourage people to vote third party while pretending not to know how the system works or you’re actually just ignorant to the issue.

I don’t normally like video links in discussions like this but this one is especially good and is only 6.5 mins.

https://youtu.be/s7tWHJfhiyo

[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

you’re either aware of the problem and want to encourage people to vote third party while pretending not to know how the system works or you’re actually just ignorant to the issu

false dichotomy

[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

FPTP voting systems result in a 2 party system and simply voting for another party does not solve the issue.

this isn't an immutable natural law.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

Your video does not explain how voting Democrat is going to fix the FTFP system.

People that don't understand politics have a better understanding than people that have been frog-boiled into voting for a Genocidal Geriatric.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

The presidential vote isn’t where we fix the voting system. We have to work in the system we have. It’s just reality.

My assessment of you hasn’t changed - you’re either completely ignorant or want Biden voters to change to third party to help Trump.

Every interaction with you has a similar quality. I’m never sure if you’re just this stupid or if you know exactly what you’re doing.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The presidential vote is where it's fixed. Republicans have already moved to ban other voting types calling them 'too complicated'. Democrats will join them the second their duopoly is endangered.

Just like how they crack down on student protests and block ballot access for third parties, Democrats have no standards either.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

The system exists as it is…. I don’t know any other way to say this. FPTP has a spoiler problem that you can’t wish away.

I’m not going to vote for a candidate that’s going to get maybe 2-5% of the vote.

I would like to bet you $1000 that either the Dem or Rep candidate will win. If anyone BUT those two win, I would pay you.

If you ACTUALLY believed anyone else will win, you’d take me up on it. What do you say?

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Strange you're including Republican in there. You believe Biden is winning right? So your money should be on Biden and any other winner would make you lose.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I’m sitting here trying to convince you that FPTP results in a two party system. I’m betting on the two parties.

YOU are the one imagining that can change by simply voting 3rd party.

So, you down for a bet or what?

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

If Biden isn't winning what's the point of voting for him?

[-] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

He is one of two possibilities.

And you’re not going to bet because you know it too.

And now we know you’re not ignorant to this fact. You’re encouraging 3rs party votes knowing very well they will not win.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

No Biden is zero of one possibility.

There's no way he's going to beat Trump.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I’m glad we finally got to you admitting 3rd parties won’t win.

Thanks.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

I'm glad we finally got you admitting that Biden wont win.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Linkerbaan logic:

3rd parties who are lucky to get 5% of the vote can win.

Biden, who won against Trump last time cannot win.

Lol

this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
958 points (91.9% liked)

Memes

45891 readers
1875 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS