334
submitted 1 month ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago

They aren't stranded because there is the emergency capsule to get them back.

Classic corporate doublespeak and half truths.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 76 points 1 month ago

They’re not stranded because the part of the capsule that isn’t working has multiple redundancy and is intended to burn up on reentry anyway.

Starliner is perfectly capable of leaving the ISS whenever they want, but they would be unable to continue collecting data on the thruster shutoff (again, because it would burn up in the atmosphere).

[-] atocci@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Completely untrue. There are currently only 3 human-rated spacecraft docked to the ISS and none of them are set aside as some sort of emergency capsule. There's no trickery here. The number of astronauts on board is equal to the number of seats available for them to ride back home in. The only reason they aren't stranded is because Starliner is still fully capable of undocking and taking them home whenever necessary. If it wasn't, then they would actually be stranded with no alternative way back beyond straping them to the floor of Dragon.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 15 points 1 month ago

Getting strapped to the floor of a Dragon sounds like a great plot for a space thriller

[-] Morphit@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago
[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Wow, that's a great fucking read!

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

Except the "emergency capsule" is all of them, including Starliner. Because Starliner is perfectly capable of returning to earth safely.

Because every thruster that has shut down has hot fired okay, and the known helium leaks still leave enough margin to cover several multiples of the 5 hours or so of RCS operation that you need to get to landing.

[-] Morphit@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

I thought one thruster has been permanently disabled now? Not that that's a major problem, but it does eat into their redundancy somewhat.

[-] atocci@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah that's right, they've decided to not use one of the 5 again because of performance inconsistencies.

this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
334 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

57226 readers
4186 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS