87
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Soup@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

“Party drama must end” says the man only really staying in because of his massive ego.

(Ya’ll still need to vote)

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

You're talking about Biden's 'massive ego' in a race with Trump as a candidate? 🤣

[-] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

DNC ego is why we got Trump in 2016.

Also Trump voters don't care about their candidate being shitty. It's a feature not a bug. Biden has people with standards and morals to motivate. Relying on the shittiness of trump is a losing move. Biden was inoffensive in 2020, that no longer the case this time round. This all is how we end up with trump again

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't disagree about the DNC's ego, but the stakes are very different from 2016.

Biden has people with standards and morals to motivate.

Are you suggesting those people with morals and standards will just abandon those morals and standards to vote Trump because Biden didn't look as good as they wanted? Or just not vote because Biden didn't live up to those standards, despite the Supreme Court and Trump making it very clear that democracy is on the ballot.

This isn't going to be a race decided by undecided voters, no one is sitting on the fence despite what the media might be saying. The only people saying they are undecided simply don't want to admit their politics out in the public.

And like you said, Trump voters see his shittiness to others as a feature, not a bug. But democrats don't. They see it for what it is, shittiness. So Why, in your mind, would Dem leaning voters look at all of the things Trump has done and decide "you know what, that Biden guy and the Democrats better align to my morals and standards, but Biden looked awfully old.. I better vote for the guy trying to destroy democracy, he's only 78 after all."

No one is seriously considering that. It's just not a real option. The only thing I could see being a possibility is people being discouraged against voting entirely because Biden didn't exactly fit into their perfect mold of a candidate. So as a protest, they abstained from voting, and in turn allowed fascism to win through their collective inaction. I can't see anybody even remotely leaning Democrat doing that though. If they've been paying even the slightest bit of attention, they've probably already decided to protest vote against Trump.

[-] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I don't think people will actively choose to vote for Trump over Biden in protest. I agree it isn't going to be a race for undecided voters but rather trying to convince people to go to the polls and then actually get them to vote for Biden.

If something g doesn't change, I think we are going to see a huge dip in voter turn out for dems. I'm sure it'll still be massive but the Delta between Trump turnout and Biden turnout will be historic

There has been a lot of talk now about "what's the plan for when trump gets reelected if we decide not to vote for Biden?". And it's a great question without a good answer. I've mentally prepared myself for Trump to win. I know that I'll likely be one of the people who vote for Biden on election day but I also think we need to have a plan for the people who won't fall in line.

Conservatives are great at falling in line. Expecting liberals/leftists/etc to fall in line is a recipe for disaster.

If I had to come up with a plan, I'd say that we should start maybe having some room for a "at least vote down ballot" message. Cause if dems significantly sweep the house/senate, maybe some checks and balances could be in place (but I won't hold my breath). But that motivation could get people show up like how the uncommitted movement in primaries worked for driving turnout.

I'm scared shirtless tho. I'm mentally preparing myself for a second term Trump. One other wildcard in this is that I really don't know how gen z is gonna act. The world is real bleak for them and I think they might really intentionally decide to be accelerationists instead of being able to be motivated by harm reduction.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

This isn't going to be a race decided by undecided voters, no one is sitting on the fence

Welp, that's the Dems and therefore the country doomed!

You just described the only voters that the DNC have cared about since 1992.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

All of donnie's faults are a given, but there is no reason we should excuse Biden's hubris if we are heading for the fascist iceberg...

[-] downpunxx@fedia.io -2 points 1 month ago

fuck off, dude beat trump the first time, and has been an excellent president

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

dude beat trump the first time

Barely. He won the popular vote by a smaller margin than Hillary did in 2016 and the few swing states that decided the outcome by a smaller margin than Trump did that year. This while being mostly known as the VP of a popular president.

has been an excellent president

No. Nowhere near as bad as the Mango Mussolini, of course, but he's been the low end of mediocre at best. And the electorate remembers how disappointing the current president has been better than how awful the previous one was. It's stupid and unfair, but that's how it is.

this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
87 points (90.7% liked)

politics

18601 readers
3826 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS