336
submitted 1 month ago by mozz@mbin.grits.dev to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Are we talking about Trump now? Man I wish I could keep track of senile old bastards. Because my senile old bastards are yelling incoherent crap and not actually in the conversation.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

As a matter of fact, we are talking about Trump. Any halfway decent 45-57 year old candidate will easily show Trump's advanced age and cognitive decline. But we don't get to run that race, because our candidate sounds like Grandpa did, the year before we put him in a nursing home.

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

This fucking narrative of bringing up trump every time someone questions Biden as a candidate is so fucking obnoxious.

We all know trump is senile and fucking insane. His voters are insane. We're talking about wether or not Biden is the best candidate to defeat him. Not everyone agrees with the narrative that swapping candidates right now is a bad idea.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

You're obnoxious with not accepting that both things can exist simultaneously.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately no. I wish. But all the wishing in the world doesn't change the position.

[-] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

So what's the play, if Republicans aren't sane enough to remove their geriatric, why should we guarantee his victory by forcing out ours without his consent.

[-] Carlo@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Well, I don't know that it's even possible to force Biden out without his consent. Certainly, it would be prohibitively difficult and contentious. Still, "If the GOP isn't doing it, why should we?" is a terrible argument, by any metric. The line of reasoning that says Biden should step aside, and support another nominee, looks like this:

  • It looks increasingly like he's going to lose.

  • If he loses, the country will—based on available evidence—likely descend into a pure kleptocracy, with fascistic and theocratic tendencies.

  • Based on his own statements, he doesn't fully grasp, or properly weigh, the consequences of losing this election. He'll feel fine about losing, as long as he does his best.

  • Given the above, maybe we'd be better off with someone else.

I'll stipulate that I was on the #binarychoice train myself until recently. The sad fact is, he's just that bad. And it's not too late to change course.

[-] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago

It's entirely likely Biden is trailing in polls because of the Democrats or others with ulterior motives reiterating that Biden should step aside that he is suffering in the polls.

Anyone who realizes the danger of Trump and project 2025 should be more than willing to say "I wish Biden would choose to step aside, but given the alternative I would vote for Biden's bloated corpse if I had to over Trump."

How about we listen to Bernie, or think a little harder, and show a little bit of solidarity for the only other current option. It's not about defending Biden despite his failings, it's about not holding him to standards his opponent doesn't have to adhere to.

If we need a candidate that isn't slowly losing their mental acuity to old age, Democrats AND Republicans need to come together and ask their respective geriatrics to resign together. Mutual adherence to the same standard, for the sake of the country.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

The Republican geriatric is leading the Democrat in the polls. Why would they show him the door? If Democrats continue this Biden route Trump will just win.

[-] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Oh, I just thought we'd treat them the same. Ya know, instead of this classic Democrat ploy of attempting to ensure a defeat.

Why is it always Democrats that have to hold their politicians to a higher bar than Republicans. How about we have some solidarity for the best chance we have at not living in a fascist shithole for once?

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Demcrats don't have morals or standards they're running a guy complicit in Genocide. What do you even mean dude??

[-] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago

That's another example of what I'm talking about. Why is it exactly we're paying attention to just Biden over that failing, when Trump is chomping at the bit to murder Palestinians, and both Democrats and Republicans alike are complicit in this genocide.

Fuck them both, but how about we not pave the way for the guy that also wants American citizens dead? Either they both mutually resign, or this is disingenuous bullshit.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

No you're saying something entirely differing stop changing the subject.

[-] GrundlButter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Nope, same shit. Treat them the same. They're voting for their enthusiastic genocidal maniac that also wants you dead. The least you can do is vote for your only real choice, your apologetic genocidal maniac that doesnt want you dead. Wish it werent this way in our political system, but it is.

Do you want to continue this pointless conversation?

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
336 points (83.9% liked)

politics

18601 readers
4106 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS