466

Oblivious rule (lemmy.world)

submitted 5 months ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Sauce on The Old Place

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] OrnateLuna@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 months ago

Is it really obliviousness if it's asexuality?

[-] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 months ago

I mean asexual doesn't necessarily imply aromantic and vice versa. I don't really think you need your own desire to have sex with someone to be able to tell they're hitting on you right? A ton of lesbians regularly have to deal with men trying to get in their pants. I just take it one step further and don't really want to have sex with anybody on my own.