1481
submitted 5 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Former President Donald Trump urged members of a crowd in Florida to vote and said that if he wins, they “won’t have to vote anymore.”

Speaking at a Turning Point Action event in West Palm Beach on Friday, Trump, who tried to overturn the 2020 election he lost, delivered a cryptic message.

“And again, Christians, get out and vote!” he said to a cheering audience. “Just this time. You won’t have to do it anymore. Four more years. You know what? It’ll be fixed! It’ll be fine! You won’t have to vote anymore, my beautiful Christians. I love you, Christians! I’m a Christian. I love you. Get out. You gotta get out and vote. In four years, you don’t have to vote again.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] overload@sopuli.xyz 261 points 5 months ago

Your country is insane.

In any other democratic nation in the world, a politician saying this would be finished.

I hope for the sake of humanity that all the sane people in the US go out and tells everyone they know that cares about democracy and the rule of law what Trump is planning to do, especially in the swing states.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 99 points 5 months ago

Our country is full of proudly ignorant bootlickers

Turns out all you need to do is make up some bullshit about "American dreams" and "bootstraps," make them believe they too can (and probably already should!) be a billionaire, and the one thing stopping that are those goddamn Marxist Democrats and their "progressive taxation," and "social safety nets for the blacks (please ignore the fact that I'm on disability, it's different)".

Republicans have been sabotaging our country's own public education system for 25+ years at this point. Selling the future prosperity of our nation down the river for a voter-base with cult-like devotion, and a unique ability to ignore objective reality.

Unfortunately for the planet, it seems to have been wildly successful.

The next step is to do away with democracy altogether.

[-] Jaderick@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It’s been the Koch brothers and the John Birch Society’s dream (amongst others) to propagandize so many people of the “American Dream” and evils of anything other than capitalism. They were ecstatic when the Tea Party movement worked out for them, but they lost control of it with Trump. It’s a monster of their own making.

[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

and evils of anything other than capitalism

*other than WHAT THEY CALL capitalism

They look at monopolies where the market leader buys laws, lobbies for protection and muscles competition out of the game unhindered and then they decry anybody calling it out as communists or socialists or the devil or whatever other bad word is en vogue that day.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You're almost there, comrade...

It's not just what they call it, this is capitalism working as intended. This is the end game. Always has been. It's just now they have the tools to essentially brainwash millions using modern tech, and a wealth disparity that has been growing constantly for what, 100 years now?

That's why it seems different this time; they learned from past attempts. Not only can you just make them not revolt (or shit, why not just Orwell it up and make it so they don't even think they want to), you can direct that hate, anger and vitriol at your "enemies" to sow more chaos and division.

I don't think any of the people responsible for planning and carrying out this decades-long coup could have predicted it would be this wildly successful.

It's like Putin tossing a million bucks to a state sponsored hacker group (because meh why not, what could it hurt?), and ending up with a fucking Manchurian candidate and an army of loyal GOP politicians terrified enough of what might leak from those hacked emails that they are literally willing to destroy their own country from the inside. Unreal.

[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Oh, this system is definitely doing what it's designed to do, but "capitalism" nominally is this fair competition among equal players where the market decides which ideas and products rise to the top based on merit and whatnot. This would, however, require a level playing field which goes out of the window the moment the strongest player on the market uses their power not to provide the best products and services, but instead uses their power to solidify their top position by legal or illegal means or in ways they make legal by lobbying, bribing and otherwise convincing the legislative. The moment the biggest corporations secure themselves the cooperation of the political parties for one-sided tax cuts, bailouts, deregulation of limits and massive regulation in favour of the corporations' goals, that is the moment where we've left this impossible ideal of capitalism far behind.

But yes, the monopolies reigning from the corpse of the capitalist idea while telling you that capitalism is alive and well have worked hard to shape the status quo to what it is and they are definitely pretending that this abomination perfectly encapsulates the unreachable purity of the perfectly fair notion of "capitalism" every chance they get.

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Kochs lost control of Trump to the JBS types. The Kochs are more Mitch McConnell type power brokers, all about the money and corporations. JBS is more MAGA, with the heavy undercurrent of conspiracy.

[-] JackiesFridge@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Exactly - I started noticing prideful ignorance in the early 2010s. People around me made bad choices and would not be corrected. Their ignorance was just as valid as someone else's actual knowledge. That's when, strengthened by their own baseless pride, their shame disappeared. I'm not saying shame is good, but when it's the only thing keeping the deplorables in check, maybe a little of it helps.

It used to be that I'm general, horrible people realised they were horrible and at least went through the motions of being decent. They were like cockroaches scurrying for the shadows when you turned on the light. Now they're like a cat peeing on your bed - they pause long enough to lock eyes with you, then continue peeing.

Speaking optimistically, at least now we know exactly who they are.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

They were like cockroaches scurrying for the shadows when you turned on the light.

Oh, I actually used this comparison once when such people still generally did that. They were pissed. I didn't directly address them BTW, they decided which side they're on for themselves.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 months ago

It's wild that all it took was one sick, deranged, racist, liar (who hasn't been able to string together a coherent sentence since the early 90s) to lead by example...

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Turns out all you need to do is make up some bullshit about “American dreams” and “bootstraps,” make them believe they too can (and probably already should!) be a billionaire, and the one thing stopping that are those goddamn Marxist Democrats and their “progressive taxation,” and “social safety nets for the blacks (please ignore the fact that I’m on disability, it’s different)”.

Well, to generalize your statement a bit, I've had a conflict with people who thought that the only thing preventing them from living in socialist heaven were jerks like me talking about human rights, market economy, transparency, accountability, governments actually changing, putting thieves in jail and getting activists out of jail, legalization of various substances, any consensual sexual activity, privacy, freedom of speech, competitive judicial system, culture of protest, yadda-yadda once a few years ...

They sincerely thought all this prevented life in my country from being good, while themselves being thieving ignorant intriguing insecure shits was normal. You know, the kind of people who contribute clearly negatively to the society, but think life is unjust to them, they should live better and somebody has stolen everything from them.

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago

The GOP have been selling these people hope and magic since Reagan. It’s no longer about hard work for republicans, now all they have to do is destroy cities and kick out everyone they don’t like, and we will return to the magic that never existed in the 1950’s.

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 65 points 5 months ago

I hate to break it to you, but it's not just our country.

[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

It may be the most successful example of indoctrination of parts of the populace of a supposedly developed nation by the ruling class though.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

It's a smashing success for regulatory capture of the courts so that unlimited funds, foreign and domestic, can be legally spent on propaganda targeting fear-addicted racists.

[-] suction@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Right, Russia is fucked too

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

This is lemmy, the goal is always to shit on America.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

Probably because it's one of the worst examples of many bad things. Source: am American. The only way you can avoid criticizing America as a thinking person is to focus on the ways it's a little better than other countries. For example we mostly have clean drinking water while other countries don't. But if you for a moment focus back on America itself it's hard not to find things that just damned well ought to be better. Never be sick in America. Our healthcare is a pathetic piece of shit!

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

I've got no problem with reasonable criticism of America. In fact I have many of my own. My issue is that here, shitting on America is well received regardless almost completely regardless of how reasonable it is.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Hmm, I don't see that. I can't remember the last time I saw an undeserved criticism of America. But I would agree with you if I did see that

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee -1 points 5 months ago

Nayib Bukele, a pretty blatant authoritarian, just won an election in El Salvador. And have you been paying attention to the rise in right wing authoritarians winning in Europe?

The idea that this is isolated to the us makes no sense.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

At what point did I or anyone say right wing authoritarianism is exclusive to the US? ....

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee -1 points 5 months ago

Literally the top level post is complaining that any blatant authoritarian would be dead in the water in any other democracy.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Ok well I was responding to the person saying the US gets unfairly criticized all the time. That is all I remember. It's not always easy to see what was said 9 levels up in the thread even if I'm not distracted by other things in life...

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] suction@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

About the clean drinking water, the first world countries all have it though

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

I realize that. I should've said that some countries don't have clean drinking water. For me it has been shocking when I've experienced that because I'm "spoiled" by safe water most places I've ever visited.

[-] suction@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

The thing is that for any single positive item many people thing of being exceptional for the US, the truth is that most other countries in the 1st world are on par or better. I mean I heard Americans wonder if Germans have access to running water, that was in 2023.

[-] Freefall@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Pointing out flaws instead of blindly shouting "murka numbuh wun!" is not a bad thing...

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

100% agreed. But that's not what I'm talking about. People just mindlessly shit on America here all the time. Just because I recognize the unreasonable American hate does not mean I'm an unreasonable American supporter. Not every is simple and black and white how you would like it.

[-] Freefall@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Is that how I would like it? I guess that is a thing I learned about myself today! Neat.

[-] suction@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

“I’m the normal one, everyone around me is crazy!!!!”

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee -1 points 5 months ago

Well, first, judging what's right based on what's popular is dumb on it's own, but it's even more dumb here because the up vote/down vote is current equal for my post, making it clearly not "everyone."

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 52 points 5 months ago

in any other democratic nation, he would have been finished in 2015, when the "grab'em by the pussy" tape came out

but no, it's 2024 and we STILL have to waste time arguing about drag queens and library books

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 34 points 5 months ago

To this day, I will never know how it didn’t end the moment he made fun of that photographer who had the deformity on his arm.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 28 points 5 months ago

the list of things that should have ended trump is too long for any comment, so here https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/01/donald-trump-worst-president-ever

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

It's because the country has a long history of treating disabled people like shit. This country literally gave the germans the inspiration to do eugenics shit.

[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago

In any other democratic nation in the world, a politician saying this would be finished.

Unfortunately not anymore, no. Bolsonaro (luckily voted out) and Orban and the Polish potato (also luckily voted out) have been spouting similar bullshit for 10+ years. Also, Erdoğan talks bullshit like that.

All of them a little less incoherent than the fat orange turd, but still, they say this kind of bullshit.

[-] ech@lemm.ee 29 points 5 months ago

The craziest part is that, even with the absolute insanity this election has already been (and it will absolutely get worse), I'm seriously worried there's going to be a worse turnout than 2020. 30% of voters are holding the country hostage, but another 30+% still can't be bothered to get out and do the most basic thing they can do to fix it. It's absurd. The nutjobs in the US are dragging the country to the gallows, but apathetic voters are tying the noose.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

I'm seriously worried there's going to be a worse turnout than 2020.

2020 had the highest voter turnout in any US election. Donald Trump got more votes in 2020 (more than 74 million) than any other Presidential candidate, winner or loser, in history.... except for Joe Biden in 2020, who got 81 million.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election

[-] ech@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I am aware (hence my point of 30%), and that was still abysmal. 60% turnout is not much of an achievement, and that only happened because of the pandemic (which is also still happening, though easier to ignore now). Existential threats to the country just aren't going to motivate the chronically apathetic the same way, even if they are actually a bigger threat overall.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Don't automatically assume the 30% who don't bother voting are guaranteed to vote against Trump. Historically, it has been younger voters who don't bother voting, and they do tend to be more liberal. But this time around, young voters are starting their adult lives in a world that is stacked against them, and they know it. They have felt the effects of post-pandemic inflation but have not had their pay raised to match. Those who were old enough to be adults pre-pandemic might very well conclude that they were better off personally when Trump was in office, and may be dismissing all the alarm at his re-election.

There have been several studies indicating that "disengaged" voters, if they show up, would break toward Republicans this time around. This article is from before Biden quit, but shows a clear preference for Trump among these voters:

https://today.yougov.com/politics/articles/49987-disengaged-voters-role-2024-election-biden-trump-poll

[-] ech@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

I'm not assuming anything. I know Trump got a hefty share of the extra voters in 2020. That doesn't change anything I said.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

It's especially weird because he's a Republican. Traditionally they're the party more sensitive to controversies like that, and older conservative folks I used to know would squirm if they saw the tapes or statements.

But honestly Trump just drowns everything out. Most people don't, and never will, know the controversies because there are simply too many to keep up with.

[-] Montagge@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago

Gingrich has been married three times. In 1962, he wed Jacqueline May "Jackie" Battley (February 21, 1936 – August 7, 2013), his former high school geometry teacher, when he was 19 years old and she was 26.

Throughout his congressional campaign in 1974, Gingrich was having an affair with a young volunteer. An aide who worked with Gingrich throughout the 1970s stated that "it was common knowledge that Newt was involved with other women during his marriage to Jackie."

In the spring of 1980, he filed for divorce from Jackie after beginning an affair with Marianne Ginther.

In September 1980, according to friends who knew them both, Newt visited Jackie in the hospital the day after she had undergone surgery to treat her uterine cancer; once there, Newt began talking about the terms of their divorce, at which point Jackie threw him out of the room.

Although Newt's presidential campaign staff continued to insist in 2011 that Jackie had requested the divorce, court documents from Carroll County, Georgia, indicated that she had in fact asked a judge to block the process, stating that although "she has adequate and ample grounds for divorce ... she does not desire one at this time [and] does not admit that this marriage is irretrievably broken."

According to L. H. Carter, Gingrich's campaign treasurer, Gingrich said of Jackie: "She's not young enough or pretty enough to be the wife of the President. And besides, she has cancer."

Following the divorce, Jackie had to raise money from friends in her congregation to help her and the children make ends meet; she later filed a petition in court stating that Newt had failed to properly provide for his family.[262] Newt submitted a financial statement to the judge, which showed that he had been "providing only $400 a month, plus $40 in allowances for his daughters. He claimed not to be able to afford any more. But in citing his own expenses, he listed $400 just for 'Food / dry cleaning, etc.'—for one person."

In 1981, a judge ordered him to provide considerably more; in 1993, Jackie stated in court that Newt had failed to obey the 1981 order "from the day it was issued."

In 1993, while still married to Marianne, Gingrich began an affair with House of Representatives staffer Callista Bisek, more than two decades his junior.

Gingrich filed for divorce from Marianne in 1999, a few months after she had been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis.

On January 19, 2012, Marianne alleged in an interview on ABC's Nightline that she had declined to accept Newt's suggestion of an open marriage.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newt_Gingrich

It's been a thing for a while. They do a performative squirm and vote for monsters anyways

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Your country is insane.

You don't say! I simply hadn't noticed! What's so crazy about people voting for someone with no experience whatsoever except for being a rich asshole which he proved every second breath? I mean that's just normal!!

this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
1481 points (97.9% liked)

News

23659 readers
3091 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS