757
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 152 points 3 months ago

This, this is what we need. If everyone votes. If we can get a progressive executive in and a progressive Congress where we can, we can potentially correct the course everything is going.

No more control of everything by the wealthy. That is the ultimate goal. We want to separate power from money.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 52 points 3 months ago

Listen to progressives, get progressive enthusiasm.

Democrats have had it backwards for so long, demanding that progressives must demonstrate more decades of unearned fealty before the party will consider listening to them.

Look what happens when they put the horse before the cart for once.

[-] glizzard@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I don’t need to be that guy, but I think we can thank Joe.

That man has been around for decades, championing neoliberal trash easily for the first two thirds. It’s taken someone like him being wrong over and over and over, getting up again, and making better decisions the next day.

Thanks, Joe.

It’s ironic that all these new lovers of geopolitics that hate Joe for his Israel stance over the years also refuse to consider American politics. Joe’s only doing what the American Empire has been working towards for a century. The fact he’s pushed back at all is incredible. This isn’t “gay marriage is a good thing” or “black people should use fountains” — the existence of Israel and western influence in that area is possibly worth trillions of dollars. Joe’s listening, he just knows more than us. Obviously.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 7 points 3 months ago

And the decision to step aside for his country to boot. Admiration abound for demonstrating true leadership there, and overall.

[-] glizzard@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

What I was referencing really, but his entire fall into mostly progressive policies has been a kind of crazy sight. Like how’d we get to Walz? This feels like a Henry Wallace pick to me. Crazy.

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Need to ungerrymander states or else you'll have nothing if the house is full of red shit state obstructionists

[-] ashok36@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Just have Harris murder them before they're sworn in and keep double tapping every new one that shows up until the state legislature get the message.

Impeachment is a joke and the scotus said presidents are immune. She can literally do whatever she wants.

/s of course

[-] Branch_Ranch@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Dark brandon still has 5 months to fuck shit up for the regressives. LETS GO!

[-] cacheson@piefed.social 10 points 3 months ago

We want to separate power from money.

Unfortunately, the two have an extremely strong attraction to each other. Keeping them apart isn't feasible in the long run without actively dismantling concentrations of power.

[-] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Money is literally power.

It is a coupon that commands a fraction of labor and capital combined.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 months ago

You'd need to get rid of the post of president for that.

[-] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 1 points 3 months ago

Or get rid of the (people that have all the) money.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

That will just make other people take that place. Better start taxing the hell out of the rich, up to 100% at a certain level.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

If we can get a progressive executive in and a progressive Congress

Hold on there. Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts has other ideas. "...we are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.....”

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Ultimately, they are cowards. And when they see the numbers of voters for the progressives, most will abandon that when we also see that a huge amount of progressives are well armed.

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
757 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19074 readers
3808 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS