758
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 months ago

Moths are just as valid as butterflies!

[-] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

As a moth aficionado, I'd say they're much more interesting. They evolved 90 million years before butterflies. There are also 9 times as many moth species as butterfly species. They're also more efficient at pollination than not only butterflies but bees. Go moths!

[-] IsoSpandy@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

They aren't related? Like it's convergent evolution shit? Or are they like moth and butterflies

[-] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 18 points 2 months ago

Butterflies are considered to have evolved from moths.

[-] pedz@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

In French they are all butterflies (papillons). There once was a distinction between butterflies and night butterflies (moths) but apparently it's now obsolete and they are just all lepidoptera.

[-] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

That seems crazy. All butterflies come from moths, so it'd make more sense for Papillon to mean moth. It's like calling everything from the order Rodentia a Capybara, or everything in Eulipotyphla a hedgehog, both things within those orders in smaller numbers.

[-] Kichae@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Weirdly enough, language largelt evolves independently from other species.

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago

Makes sense to me, they're so furry they must carry pollen everywhere

this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
758 points (97.5% liked)

Comic Strips

12390 readers
3922 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS