755
Bluesky has gained a million new users in the last three days.
(www.theverge.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
755 points (97.1% liked)
Technology
60016 readers
2793 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
What are blueskys current userbase numbers, mastodons current userbase numbers, and are they federated with each other?
no. there's a sort of a third party bridge, but it requires an account on one platform to follow a bot in order to show up on another, so if someone on Bluesky doesn't explicitly do it and you're using Mastodon, then you're not going to connect.
Two competing federation standards. The VHS and Betamax, or Blu Ray and HD-DVD, of 2024.
Bluesky: https://bsky.jazco.dev/stats Mastodon: https://fedidb.org/software/mastodon
There isn’t a 1:1 comparison. But the closest comparison looks like Mastodon is on a bit of a decline at 800k MAU. Bluesky is roughly 400k daily likers.
That does not seem to know about Bluesky
Right, because FediDB tracks activitypub, which bluesky is not built upon.
Oh, right. I guess I forgot all the individual questions. My bad.
How did you take away "they were asking about Mastodon" when the question mentioned bluesky first? OP was asking for a comparison of the two, which your link does not provide, putting your answer somewhere between unhelpful and irrelevant.
You keep arguing with people pointing this out as if your response was a complete answer... It seems like you cherry picked the middle of their question and ignored the rest. The more-generous interpretation of this scenario is that your reading comprehension sucks. That's my point.
And if you're really feeling so insulted by my pointing that out,
edit: and it would have taken such a small additional effort to maybe clarify that you were only addressing part of the question instead of dropping a link with no explanation. You could've prevented a lot of confusion by being a little less lazy in your original reply.
Sure, but dari does not address 2/3rds of their answer. Just posting a link makes it seem like it does. You could've added that it only addresses Mastodon's user base from their answer and not Bluesky's nor wether they can communicate.
that's for fediverse. not bluesky
They do not federate with each other AFAIK, Mastodon's user base is in another user's answer, Bluesky's IDK except apparently one million more than before