1294
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 115 points 3 months ago

This needs to be very widely publicized.

[-] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 71 points 3 months ago

It was a presidential debate. It was fairly publicized.

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 85 points 3 months ago

I think maybe they mean... Like, not washed out by the other 90 minutes of crazy shit he was saying.

[-] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 21 points 3 months ago

Oh no doubt. I only wish she hadn't spent so much time explaining what a fucking idiot he was instead of taking about herself or her plans. He made all those talking points for her by, well, talking... It was a great beat down nonetheless, and I get it was her one time to really make a fool out of him in person, but again, he did that better than anyone ever could.

Great show overall, would watch season 2.

[-] Hayduke@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

She walked him like a dog. Flatly stated he could be easily manipulated, and proceeded to do just that. He could not even muster the courage to make meaningful eye contact with her the entire debate. She just stared him down and dominated him. How brutally emasculating for him.

[-] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago

Watching it made me so hungry, going to doordash some fried kitten.

[-] obinice@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

I dunno, I just read an article about that country's political debate from last night and it didn't mention this point, it was mostly discussing how angry that bloke got at the other politician and how overall it seems like it was a bad night for him and a good night for her.

The specifics were a bit overshadowed by the perceived importance of the event and it's outcome itself, I think.

I'm sure in the coming days some more details will flow out of the USA and we'll hear some discussion of specifics where they concern us, like their politician's stances on the war in Europe, I agree. I've just not seen it mentioned just yet is all.

But it's only 7am and I think the debate was in the middle of the night, so I shouldn't expect much yet haha :-D

[-] Bwaz@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

But Kamala Harris should have poited that out and reminded everyone that Trump wouldn't answer. Then it would be her jabbing him instead of some talking head no one knows letting it pass. Missed opportunity.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It will not put off his voters. Some of them just don't care about anything international. Others admire Putin as a strongman who isn't afraid to kill his enemies and persecute minorities, a moral conservative, a self-professed Christian, an ally against democracy and a defender of the same bigotries they share.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

He doesn't just need the MAGA faithful to win. I can't believe I have to keep saying this.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

You're right. The hope is that they're not enough and he fails to attract anyone else.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I don't think he's gaining voters and I do think he's losing them.

[-] Crampon@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

It won't. Because people are hung up about the eating pets thing. Which, insane as it is might have happened.

Idk why the actual issues are swept under the rug, and the controversial takes are the focus.

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
1294 points (98.3% liked)

World News

39276 readers
1667 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS