1317
WTF???
(sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
1317 points (97.3% liked)
People Twitter
5392 readers
407 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a tweet or similar
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Context?!
Why isn’t any of this surprising?
No, you see it isn't illegal if you are conservative.
Yup, conservatives are Good Guys so their deeds are Good.
So I looked into this some more, he apparently posted a screenshot from a really infamous child torture video called Daisy's Destruction, it was a screenshot of the toddler actually being tortured on her foot. I had no idea this video even existed online, he claims that he got it/the screenshot from the Dutch Police. He also might have posted a naked picture of Daisy on Peter Scully's lap. He also apparently posted it on Instagram where it is still up but I don't want to check whether that's true. That is insane wtf is wrong with him
Well this took me down a Wikipedia rabbit hole I really shouldn't have fallen
I have morbid curiosity but I won't be touching that. The short description alone is already too much.
That is wise. Don't even look up the name of the guy.
My life is worse off for having read this comment. It's needs a spolier alert or something. I'm just sick.
Reinstated so that the FBI can investigate I hope ...
Reinstated because it's a Republican account I suspect ...
This is the worse timeline.
Shoulda made a hard left back in 2015
Preach
“people who claim to be religious fanatics are pedos” isn’t a new thing.
A tale as old as time
okay, they're psycho rapists.
Wtf !!
Actual CP
In a place where a piece of text can incorporate, a drawing has human* rights.
(*not applicable to actual humans)
Your ignorance doesn't excuse your language.
Ask politely and you might learn which country meets what I said.
That's not really the context. Need to see what that tweet (if it's even real) is responding to.
QAnon people are posting photos of child sexual assaults “to raise awareness” because they’re too fucking stupid to realize that’s still insanely illegal and you don’t get to rob banks to raise awareness of bank robbers. (Or they’re just pedophiles trying to share images via a loophole that doesn’t exist.)
One prominent conservative guy got flagged by Twitter and had his account suspended. Elon claims only a few employees saw the image but that turned out to be a lie. It was up for 4 days and had something like 8000+ RTs and 1.3 million views. Elon basically intervened and unsuspended the guy’s account.
Also, if you’d like additional context, [insert photo of Musk with Gislaine Maxwell].
Additional context:
Why does yout comment say "Blocked by an instance filter for feddit.de"
You most likely blocked the instance feddit.de
Here, a discussion about this
Thanks
Don't block the whole instance, just the non English communities if you want
I know when pedophiles tried to normalise pedophilia on Twitter by associating themselves with the LGBT community or by coming up with that nomap bullshit. I would assume they are just that. Pedos.
Also, it is widely known that pedos project like motherfuckers. That teenage billionaire sure threw those accusations around a lot.
Well to be fair his father is a well-known groomer and pedophile.
Say sike right now.
Please.
Or is it because they think they are being clever and think that they can get away with it as long as they are yelling loudly enough about how much it disgusts them.
conteXt?