174
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by o7___o7@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

John Mulaney gets paid by prompt fondlers to tell jokes at a party. He spends 45 minutes telling them that they are idiots, which is nice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] V0ldek@awful.systems 33 points 4 days ago

“You’re a VP of customer success?” he asked another attendee. “Congratulations on your position that did not exist five years ago!”

Okay what the fuck is a "VP of customer success" though, that's a title so made up money laundering has to be involved, no?

[-] gerikson@awful.systems 21 points 4 days ago

"Customer success" has been creeping into biztalk lately. According to Ed Zitron it refers to that subspecies of salescritter that works with SaaS ~~victims~~customers to ensure they keep expanding their buying.

Basically, yeah. At my last job working in vendor support the "customer success" team was entirely sales-focused. Support (as in "my product isn't working as expected please help") was under a different department that would sometimes get badgered by the customer success guys if it seemed like a case was making it harder to upsell, or if the customer's problem was that they wanted to do something their current purchase didn't cover.

[-] antifuchs@awful.systems 18 points 4 days ago

The industry called it “field engineering” previously, and “customer support” prior to that; renames happened every time the execs heard how this portion of their business is only a cost center and can easily be done by chat bots (to which the customer success people would say, good luck with that).

[-] expr@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago

Usually it's the part of the org that is directly interacting with big, corporate customers. Those customers can and often do directly shape how a product works. It's like a sales team, but focused on existing customers with big contracts (that might be expanded), rather than acquiring new customers.

But admittedly, this has just been my experience. I'm sure it's probably not universally true.

[-] fasterandworse@awful.systems 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It's like how "marketing" became "UX research/design"

[-] joao@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Marketing has not become UX research/design, you can't possibly know what UX design is and say that.

[-] fasterandworse@awful.systems 5 points 3 days ago

Ok, you’ve convinced me

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

in a startup model where product directly implements function requests from clients, it'd be the head of deciding which functions, sprints, priorities etc.

And/or ensuring that clients are handled well enough so they're not at risk of churn at the q3/q4 turnaround.

[-] vin@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 4 days ago

It's just support and upsell

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
174 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1296 readers
166 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS