1100
🎵In the Arms of an Angel🎵
(slrpnk.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
1100 points (99.1% liked)
Orphan Crushing Machine
608 readers
1 users here now
A community featuring uplifting and wholesome news stories that overlook deeply ingrained systemic problems.
The rules:
1. Your post must be an unironic presentation of a wholesome story, but one that overlooks systemic failures that made the story possible in the first place. In other words, we want posts that highlight "Yay, the problem is solved!", but ignore "Wait, why was this a problem in the first place?" at the same time.
2. Re-posts will be removed at mod discretion.
3. Sitewide rules apply. Basically, (a) don't be a dick; (b) use the NSFW tag; (c) no spam; (d) don't attack people; and (e) don't abuse the report button.
Partnered communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Doesn't this kids parents pay for it? How else does he get "allowance"?
I know another way parents can contribute to the so-called lunch debt...
Wait what if everyone just paid a little bit of money so that kids could eat. Even people without kids would pay and it would just be taken out of their pay… or kids can go hungry…
I make my kids lunches every day. I still would if they were free, and school lunch should be free.
I wish I could comprehend why some people think hungry kids is OK. At the same time... I kind of don't want to understand them. I want them to not be selfish pieces of shit instead.
Usually the excuse I hear on the ''we can't just feed children'' crowd is that they don't want their tax money, or anyone else's helping the WRONG children. Often they mean non white children. There's a strong history in white supremacy of stopping people from feeding black children, government or private efforts, the FBI has killed people over it.
Oh I know the excuses they give (and the racism behind so much of it). I just can't comprehend why, which is why I say I don't want to understand, just have them, you know, not be shitty.
At least locally there is a push for it which I'm advocating for. We just got preschool for free too, so that's a step in the right direction - lunch is next on the docket, I expect some battles there...
So many of them are afraid. The fear centre in a conservative’s brain is show to work overtime compared to others’.
If you want to see the number on your paycheque go up you have two options: get paid more or pay less in tax. You have some semi-direct power over the government when you vote and vague transparency means that you kinda know where the money is going. Raising your pay, though, is a lot harder. You have no safety net and you know that executives and middle management are big babies so losing income and references is very dangerous. You basically have to be incredibly gentle with those people or even put yourself down or they will hurt you without a moment’s thought for a quick buck and a little petty revenge.
You run through those cycles enough times and you get a large group of people with fucked up generational/cultural trauma where they will blame the government for letting corporations do things like leave for other countries instead of being mad at the corporations for abandoning us so that number go up. They’ll blame immigrants for taking the jobs but not the companies for firing locals to brutally exploit migrants who are just trying to survive. They are so used to the evil of corporations that they’re numb and call others crazy for wanting things to change.
Basically even the best intentioned ones are profoundly stupid cowards who have turned to the most wild levels of simping for people they know are evil because they’re afraid of being punished. They go after anyone who might make the corporations angrier and meaner, usually the government and the implementation of taxes and regulations, and punch down because they don’t even have the courage to punch laterally, let alone upwardly.
(And now a lot of them are just generationally brainwashed wahooo)
This story should help you comprehend that crowd. In their ideal world, hungry children pull themselves up by their bootstraps because being hungry motivates them to work harder. Children working to pay off their lunch debt is the pinnacle of their ideology.
I'm sorry. We're too busy trying to take money from that system so we can give it to rich people who want to send their kids to private school
I am extremely cynical about the semi-frequent "fun runs" to raise money for cancer research or whatever in my city. It's usually upper middle / upper class people feeling good about themselves for raising a couple of hundred bucks each, and diverting traffic and trams on the weekend (when this affected me I was a cafe worker commuting on the weekends).
You know how else we could fund this cancer research, and way more than your feel-good bullshit? Oh yeah, we could tax you properly. No more capital gains discount, etc.
I feel the same about Movember and my company promoting it. You know how else we could raise money for men's health, company, you could pay more in tax. Just like a tiny bit more would be waaaaay more than the piddly little tax free donation you're kicking in.
Charity fund-raising is only necessary because of the failure of the state, mostly. In my opinion.
I really doubt his parents specifically are the problem. They seem more than willing to give him enough money to do so, usually if my kids give me a financial goal I can afford I try and make it easier for them to get that amount of money.
Certainly not blaming the parents, glad it happened. Shame it had to happen. Confusing it happened in this way...