155

Printed 118 years ago today in the Spokane Press. Image cleaned up, see the original.

Found on the Library of Congress site.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Seleni@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

Kids back then were seen as property of their parents (in case you were wondering where that idea comes from when it pops up now and again today), and thus technically their discipline was also the province of their parents.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

Where is the follow up comic of Everett slapping the parents around?

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

But isn't beating someone up also a violation of their rights?

[-] Seleni@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Kids didn’t have rights, any more than a dog or horse or chair did. They were seen as property. Both by the law and by custom.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

In this case, the rights refer to the adult who "owned" them.

[-] Seleni@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Right, hence him saying ‘I know I haven’t any right to do this’. He was infringing on their rights, with them not present to object.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yes, and he's also infringing on their rights when he beats them up, yet has no problem with it.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
155 points (97.0% liked)

Everett True Comics

743 readers
1 users here now

A place to appreciate the twentieth century comic character Everett True of "The Outbursts of Everett True." Feel free to check out the sticky.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS