240
Gun Companies Gave Customers’ Sensitive Personal Information to Political Operatives
(www.propublica.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
240 points (99.6% liked)
News
23659 readers
3563 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Now is not the time to talk about gun privacy control.
I agree, we need action to protect people's privacy from unethical warrantless searches and monitoring.
Snowden tried to warn us...
Oh I got the point Squid, I disagree :)
Tell me, do you feel Jan 6th was a genuine coup attempt? As in, DJT and his ilk were actually interested in and attempting to maintain and consolidate their power in the government outside of the election results?
The facts reported by the Jan 6th committee made it clear that it was a premeditated coup attempt.
Exactly. Now assuming they were successful (or a future attempt is) how do we fight them? I somehow doubt a peaceful march will sway them to restore democracy.
What does this have to do with the post subject? I don't think anyone here is suggesting a peaceful march in that case.
I mistakenly thought Squid was suggesting that privacy for gun owners wasn't a valid topic for discussion.
Following that, I was establishing the importance of privacy for gun owners because, well... We may need them if there is a successful coup.
I have no idea what you mean by "DJT and his ilk." None of them were breaking into congress. The people that were wanted to install Trump as president and do it by executing Mike Pence. They made that very clear. So yes, that was a coup attempt. I'm not sure why you think Trump had to be directly involved to make it a coup attempt.
If you don't know who "DJT and his ilk" are, then who is "them" in your response?
Point is, if your government is about to be overrun, why would you give the government/state a monopoly on violence?
Do you trust the police/military to be the sole owners of firearms given the current political climate? I know you don't like cops Squid, and Trump has already threatened to deploy the military against civilians and political opponents.
I thought your point is it wasn't a coup attempt.
Your point seems to keep changing.
You also seem to think I want to ban guns for some reason. I don't know why because I never said I did.
My point hasn't changed at all, my point was to establish that you agree it was a coup attempt.
Given a possible coup, a list of all gun owners (regardless of political affiliation) is bad. Privacy rights are important, even for people we disagree with.
Remember when I said privacy rights aren't important? Because I sure don't.
Maybe I really did miss the point. What did you mean by, "Now is not the time to talk about gun privacy control."
I took it to mean you didn't think it was a valid issue for discussion.
You sure did.
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4279085-speaker-johnson-says-now-not-the-time-to-discuss-gun-control-problem-is-the-human-heart-not-guns/
https://meidasnews.com/news/rep-collins-its-not-the-time-to-talk-about-gun-control
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/10/trump-says-its-the-wrong-time-to-discuss-gun-control-in-las-vegas-even-gun-owners-disagree/
https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/02/politics/sarah-sanders-las-vegas/index.html
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/03/mitch-mcconnell-gun-control-las-vegas-shooting-243418
I can keep going if you like, but something tells me you still won't get it if I do.
Squid, you are always a joy to converse with. I'd like to know what your "something" is but something tells me you won't tell me if I ask 😉
You could have just mentioned that you were referencing other responses to previous events. Regardless, I'll take the L because I guess I did miss the point.