200
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] OneRedFox@beehaw.org 100 points 1 day ago

The Pixelfed guy does good work, but video hosting/streaming is the most difficult use-case to compete in due to infrastructure costs; I'm interested to see how he's planning to handle this and I wish him luck.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago

I think federated non-profit video platforms won't work on large scale without P2P.

[-] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Also there is no casino algorithm showing you what big data knows will make you stay for a while.

In TikTok or instagram reels, you don't follow people you like. You just watch stuff happening.

[-] lily33@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In TikTok or instagram reels, you don’t follow people you like. You just watch stuff happening.

That's actually the whole point of TikTok, what made it different when it started. An app for short videos where you follow people you like is more of a Snapchat competitor, not TikTok.

[-] krimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 day ago

I think that pixelfed guy has a big problem with commitment, he has so many unfinished/unpolished projects, and he'd be able to do so much more if he wasn't starting something new every other month.

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 9 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Yeah okay, so it sounds like he's the kind of guy who'll build a framework, or most of it, and won't ever really become capable of hosting a lot of videos at a watchable quality.

Technically he'll probably have built something basically functional the community could rally behind and get going. But that won't happen, because the people who care about the Fediverse are few, insufficiently resourceful, and most importantly don't care about shorts.

[-] Corgana@startrek.website 5 points 18 hours ago

Not at all, Pixelfed is very polished and gets regular updates.

[-] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

he mentioned in the past that the videos will be automatically deleted after some period of time, so that should make the storage situation a little bit more manageable.

[-] averyminya@beehaw.org 3 points 16 hours ago

How ephemeral.

I can't wait for it to be used for important long term information.

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 2 points 14 hours ago

Important long term storage in short video clips?

[-] averyminya@beehaw.org 1 points 13 hours ago

It seems to be what's popular these days

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 points 23 hours ago

I think streaming works best where people self host their own media tbf.

[-] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 20 points 22 hours ago

Self hosting isn't really compatible with viral content, you do something that blows up and either get the hug of death or go bankrupt from the bandwidth costs.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 14 hours ago

Reminds me of the time somebody namedropped a hobbyist's project on prime time national radio in the UK. Their project was a train timetable tracker website, made because the official resource didn't work too well. The site went down nearly instantly 🤣

[-] 0x1C3B00DA@fedia.io 4 points 21 hours ago

Maybe the problem in that equation is the expectation of virality and not self hosting?

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 4 points 19 hours ago

It doesn't matter if virality is the goal, unless you're suggesting it be actively prevented, virality is just a natural phenomenon of the internet. The term viral generally implies uncontrolled exponential spread. To this day, stuff goes viral without people intending it to.

And if you architect the system to scale a p2p network proportional to virality (ex. as people share it, they also self-host) you run into a ton of security and abuse challenges. We're also stretching the definition of "self-hosting" at this point.

[-] 0x1C3B00DA@fedia.io 1 points 18 hours ago

Self hosting isn't really compatible with viral content

The post I was replying to claimed virality and self hosting are at odds with one another because it causes skyrocketing expense. My point was that maybe someone selfhosting a server in the fediverse is not as interested in virality. And I doubt even the most viral posts in the fediverse would break the bank of a selfhoster

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 17 hours ago

And my point was directly in response to your point.

[-] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

We are talking about a TikTok alternative. If getting as many people as possible to see your stuff isn't your goal, then why would you post it in the first place?
Making your content go viral is pretty much literally the only point.

[-] 0x1C3B00DA@fedia.io 2 points 19 hours ago

Virality is nowhere near the only reason for posting videos. People post them to make jokes, teach something, reply to someone else, etc, or all the same reasons someone might make a blogpost or a post on a link aggregator.

[-] lauha@lemmy.one 1 points 1 day ago

Snapchat would have been easier in that sense

this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
200 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

37677 readers
446 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS