122
submitted 17 hours ago by 666@lemmygrad.ml to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

https://www.reddit.com/r/CuratedTumblr/comments/1gcvh31/why_is_every_tankie_like_i_dont_understand_the/

Because the government is a terrorist state that sponsors genocide and the branches of that terrorist state sponsor terrorism globally.

"UWU the dems are just so powerless UWU!"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] regul@hexbear.net 23 points 17 hours ago

I remember reading about the Parliamentarian in the Constitution and civics class. What's wrong with you tankies?

[-] Hexboare@hexbear.net 23 points 16 hours ago

The parliamentarian just provides advice on the consistency of procedures - they can just make amend the procedures.

[-] regul@hexbear.net 11 points 16 hours ago
[-] Frank@hexbear.net 26 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Is this a bit? I cannot stress this enough, per the SCOTUS Biden could legally take a bust of John Kennedy and beat the Parliamentarian to death on the floor of Congress. The Parliamentarian can also be easily replaced if they won't play ball, which as been done before. Or congress could just ignore them.

But the ruling likely makes it easier for Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer to get his members in line behind the bill since the rise in the minimum wage had been a key sticking point for moderates like Sens. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Joe Manchin of West Virginia.

Lol

White House officials, cognizant of the potential math problem with Senate Democrats if the minimum wage increase were in the final package, had been counting on the provision being stripped, the administration official told CNN.

Also, lol

“I strongly disagree with tonight’s decision by the Senate Parliamentarian,” Sanders said in a statement Thursday evening. “The (Congressional Budget Office) made it absolutely clear that raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour had a substantial budgetary impact and should be allowed under reconciliation. It is hard for me to understand how drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge was considered to be consistent with the Byrd Rule, while increasing the minimum wage is not,” Sanders added, referring to the rule – named after the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd – that prohibits including “extraneous” measures as part of the budget process that Democrats are employing to send the Covid-19 relief package to Biden’s desk by early March.

It would have been nice if Sanders had died at some narratively significant moment when we still believed in him.

[-] regul@hexbear.net 3 points 7 hours ago

It's a bit about how the Democrats constantly invent new and exciting reasons to explain why they can't do anything useful.

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 2 points 7 hours ago

Cool cool. Thank you for letting me know.

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 25 points 15 hours ago

“Let’s be clear: raising the minimum wage is COVID-19 relief,” Washington Rep. Pramila Jayapal, the chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said in a statement responding to the ruling. “We simply cannot go back to the Black, Brown, AAPI, Indigenous, poor and working class voters who delivered us the White House and the Senate majority and tell them that an unelected parliamentarian advised us – based on arcane rules – that we could not raise the minimum wage as we promised,” she added, calling on the Senate to reform the filibuster “to allow populist and necessary policies like the $15 minimum wage to pass with a majority of the Senate.”

It's such a beautifully fine-tuned machine. Almost makes me weep.

[-] Hexboare@hexbear.net 17 points 14 hours ago

I can't tell if this is a sarcastic bit or not?

I haven't read the article because it's CNN so I assume they never actually say something like "the Parliamentarian is elected for life and has an unbreakable veto", they just allude to it to make the reader draw that conclusion themselves.

If it's not a bit I can dig up some more info on the role of the Parliamentarian.

I'm not American so the closest the civics-equivalent class came to this process is where, if the Senate fails to pass a House bill twice, the government can dissolve parliament and hold an election immediately. Then after an election, if the Senate still refuses to pass the same House bill, the government can essentially merge the upper and lower houses for a voting session to get stuff through.

[-] regul@hexbear.net 3 points 7 hours ago

It's a bit about how the Democrats constantly invent new and exciting reasons to explain why they can't do anything useful.

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
122 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15906 readers
567 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS