454
submitted 1 month ago by Kory@lemmy.ml to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Seen on the FOSS Weekly #24.44: https://itsfoss.com/newsletter/foss-weekly-24-44/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 month ago

I'm not sure what this comic is trying to say but in my recent experience a single misbehaving website can still consume all available swap at which point Linux will sometimes completely lock up for many minutes before the out-of-memory killer decides what to kill - and then sometimes it still kills the desktop environment instead of the browser.

(I do know how to use oom_adj; I'm talking about the default configuration on popular desktop distros.)

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah, OOM not being aggressive enough (i.e. not triggering at all) is an age old issue. There's earlyoom or nohang for this, further ressources in the description.

[-] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 2 points 1 month ago

Real, happened too many times to me. What's that about configuring the OOM, can you give it priorities?

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The canonical documentation is https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/filesystems/proc.rst (ctrl-f oom) but if you search a bit you'll find various guides that might be easier to digest.

https://www.baeldung.com/linux/memory-overcommitment-oom-killer looks like an informative recent article on the subject, and reminds me that my knowledge is a bit outdated. (TIL about the choom(1) command which was added to util-linux in 2018 as an alternative to manipulating things in /proc directly...)

https://dev.to/rrampage/surviving-the-linux-oom-killer-2ki9 from 2018 might also be worth reading.

How to make your adjustments persist for a given desktop application is left as an exercise to the reader :)

[-] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks! Will have to come back to this

[-] kolorafa@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Linux is slow at killing apps when you run out of memory because it was designed to also run on low spec hardware even if very slowly (making the ui totally unrensposnive) due to swapping.

This comic is about the kill command, how Linux kernel is handling force stopping apps vs (old?) Windows when if App frozed it was hard to close it. Now with modern apps and hardware you very rarely see that as most apps are designed to have asynchronous logic that is correctly handled, but it's still more or less relevant.

this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
454 points (93.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21282 readers
528 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS