558

Yeah, both sides amiright?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Most likely what happened was inflation and a whole lotta price gouging, and people think Biden was to blame. The same people seem to think that donvict has a magic wand.

[-] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 12 points 2 weeks ago

It's exactly this.

Trump promised easy solutions to the problems caused by the right, and by corporate oligarchs. They went along with it, and voted for him. They're now in for a wild ride.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yep. This is truly going to be the finding out stage for them, except, unfortunately, all of us are going to pay the price for their stupidity.

[-] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

My wishful hope is that because some of the effects (i.e. prices after blanket tariffs) will be so demonstrably bad for their wellbeing, and will appear much quicker, rather than being delayed (i.e. inflation) that they will actually notice that their own side did something bad, and maybe the more moderate, single-issue voters (primarily those on the economy) will wise up and vote against them in 2028.

If we even have an election in 2028, that is.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Biden's response to the price gouging was a super bowl ad in which he asked those who were engaging in shrinkflation to cut it out.

[-] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

it was all about the eggs.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 weeks ago

It takes a lot of mental gymnastics to claim he isn't to blame.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, like hearing corporate oligarchs bragging on earnings calls about being able to get away with price-gouging the American people because "Bidenflation"? Didn't require any mental gymnastics, actually.

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm sorry. You're agreeing with me that he's to blame for being complicit through his inaction? It sounds like you're trying to disagree with me but you're just giving concrete examples of why I'm right.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
558 points (94.1% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1987 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS