663
Imperial rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 week ago

You’re still avoiding the question. How are you advocating for “peaceful, dovish, and isolationist” countries if neither Russia or China is any of those things?

And don't keep trying that “well that’s just your viewpoint” bullshit. You and I both know neither of those countries could be objectively described with any of those adjectives, no matter how much you want to try to justify them.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I never said, "well that's just your viewpoint," or anything like that. Not sure where you're getting that from.

I answered the question very clearly. Advocating for peace necessarily means rejecting the idea that a given war is necessary to confront foreign threats. Peace advocates in every conflict, by every side, are frequently labeled as traitors who support the worst offenses of the other side, "you're either with us or with the terrorists," as Bush said. The tankie label is simply another form of this. I don't see what's confusing about that.

this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
663 points (94.3% liked)

196

16591 readers
2880 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS