cute dogs, cats, and other animals

11473 readers

2 users here now

founded 5 years ago

Moonlighting: Dog-sitter films explicit OnlyFans content in client homes, raising privacy concerns (www.cbc.ca)

submitted 3 months ago by TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com to c/aww@lemmy.ml

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, IDGAF if someone is masturbating in my home, as long as they follow two rules: clean it up, and no pictures of my home. That's just rude as fuck for even a guest, much less someone that's being paid to primarily pay attention to the animals. You can't actually do both and do them right.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

On top of that, I would also be concerned about personal/private information potentially being published if they're careless about what's in the background of their footage.

[–] CodingCarpenter@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

And exif data

[–] SolOrion@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

If the Onlyfans model isn't stripping out exif data already they have larger problems than pissing off the person they're dogsitting for.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

Good point. Like SolOrion hinted, I hope they strip EXIF.

But if not, when some babysitter takes a video and an expensive item is visible in it, a savvy thief might target it.