comfy

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

The reddit thread proposes it could have been a lie for propaganda.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

Not merely funded, owned by a for-profit.

It exists for profit. That is its goal and purpose.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 19 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Drawing a swastika into a window is one of the classic ways to quickly obfuscate nazi graffiti, but I assume based on the new text that this is just a weird shitty attempt at wolf-whistling rather than jamming a regretted tattoo. Lame, poorly-done and cowardly, the hallmarks of the neo-Nazi.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 3 points 17 hours ago

Democracy is not automatically "good". Democracy is a tool. When applied in an appropriate way and to an appropriate voter base (one informed and smart enough to, on average, make a correct vote), it's a great decision-making tool. It also has the ability to empower a larger number of people, which has real tangible benefits. When applied in an inappropriate way... well just look around. Most liberal democracies have just become a pay-to-win competition for the mega-rich to launder their dictatorship though.

I say this as someone who has designed and run democratic projects, and someone who is generally pro-democracy, yet against most existing "democratic countries".

It's also important to note historical cases like the 1917 October Revolution, where there became an interesting question of whether a liberal democracy was more important than putting power in the hands of the working class - the second option was closer to the goals of an ideal democracy, despite appearing to be an anti-democratic authoritarian seizure of power. Consider alternative cases, like democracies which have allowed right-wing authoritarians to legally gain large amounts of power (e.g. Hitler, Trump) and whether it was more important to preserve a malfunctioning liberal democracy or to prevent a harmful regime taking over.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 13 points 17 hours ago
[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I have a soft spot for new planes being shot down by "outdated" technologies.

[translations, copypasted, so you don't have to visit the source on reddit]

translations:

  • "Sorry, your plane is on fire"(rhymes in Serbian)
  • "Mine is visible, but doesn't crash!"
  • "Airplane junkyard: 'We have F-117 parts!'"
  • "The ground suddenly got in his way"
  • "Missed the Surčin airport"
  • "Look, daddy, no hands!"
  • "What's going to happen with the White House? I'm going to set it on fire!"
  • "Give us another one... I need a roof for my pig pen!"

Followed by three more phrases which don't translate well.

  • "Like a child knows what is invisible"
  • "We'll fuck, NATO, my bro!"
  • "Short but 'effective' "
[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Waterfox try to remove some blobs of Firefox out of the box, so it’s better for the normal user

How is removing blobs better for the normal user?

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 43 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (19 children)

The write-up they link is also insightful. Notably, they "explicitly reject these accusations" of being Zionists and insist it's a legal precaution required by their countries.

I've bought servers for hosting some small communities and I sometimes thought maybe I was paranoid for retaining anonymity and carefully picking the country and company to allow muh freedoms as far as speech goes, but it's interesting seeing .world and feddit pull out the "just following legislation" card (which is understandable, given that staff imprisonment is obviously bad for their community, but also irresponsible and complicit to simply accept the situation instead of resolving it, and because this is an internet community there are safe ways to resolve it).

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Assuming you're using the default Lemmy UI, there's a block settings menu in your account settings page. It's worth exploring, there's some good options to play around with.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

Did it show you a specific error/ban message?

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 days ago

Heh, don't let that fool you, they still infight like crazy despite that. Examples include the hilarious collapse of the NJP, the assassination of Rockwell (leader of the American Nazi Party) and labeling every existing neo-Nazi group "feds" because they're inevitably embarrassing and scandal-filled.

 

This is for the purpose of drawing comparisons between them and other MoP changes, like capitalism->socialism. This comparison could be useful for refuting the claim that the decades-long M-L state efforts to transition the MoP are a sign of failed revolution or capitalist corruption (e.g. "it's been [x] years and china hasn't established a worker's utopia yet!")[1].

 

I'm sick of having to look up what country an author is from to know which variant of teaspoon they're using or how big their lemons are compared to mine. It's amateur hour out there, I want those homely family recipes up to standard!

What are some good lessons from scientific documentation which should be encouraged in cooking recipes? What are some issues with recipes you've seen which have tripped you up?

 

"Luigi mural spotted in Varna, Bulgaria"

via https://todon.eu/@RadicalGraffiti/113839508830970372

 

If I remember correctly, this is a legal mural on a spray-paint shop in Sydney, Australia.

via https://todon.eu/@RadicalGraffiti/113821907116479158

Front photo: https://todon.eu/@h1dden@mastodon.social/113796031786633245

 

(made before the suspect was named)

 

Is the pro-China M-L position that the CPC leadership is merely an independent vanguard class benevolently working for the good of the proletariat to transition the state to a socialist mode of production, or is it that the CPC themselves form a dictatorship of the proletariat?

  • If the former, what material motivation does the CPC have to side with the proletariat when classes come into conflict? Does their socialist movement ultimately just hinge on the good will of those selected by the party to lead the party? Is this system simply benevolent class collaboration with a disempowered bourgeoisie, thus distinguishing it from past class collaboration failures?

  • Otherwise, if the latter, what makes the CPC's dictatorship 'of the proletariat'?

    • Does this imply the CPC must be a democratic organization? In most provinces, direct voting by the masses exists only at the local level, but only between candidates pre-approved by the CPC. The proletariat is therefore not in control of these local candidates, and therefore not in control of the subsequent levels of elections. Surely, this would make it as much of a democracy of the proletariat as a liberal democracy is.
    • What power does the proletariat itself hold over the party's rule? If the proletariat truly does not approve of their representation, do they have the power to reject it?

The results speak for themselves, but is the PRC at this point in time ultimately a victory over capitalism, without the proletarian dictatorship that Marx assumed necessary, instead forming a stable non-bourgeois state?

 

Real and true poem written by a hundred people yesterday:

First they banned the Chapos
And I did not leave
Because I was not a Chapo

Then they banned GenZedong
And I did not leave
Because I was not from GenZedong

Then they banned the API
And I did not leave
Because I did not use mobile apps

Then they banned the Luigiposters
And I did not leave
Because I was not posting Luigi

Then they came for Luigivoters
And there was no one left
To upvote me
view more: next ›