64
submitted 1 week ago by bpt11@sh.itjust.works to c/linux@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It depends. It's viable if you just need a phone with several open source applications (non-Android) and are fine with that. But if you need Android app compatibility it's probably going to be harder or more inconvenient to do, though I haven't checked the status in recent time. And then there's this evil thing called Google Play Integrity (essentially DRM restricting which apps can run on which OS) which is a problem even for non-proprietary Androids, so you probably won't have any chance if you're dependent on such an app (thankfully it's rare but as we all know stupid ideas tend to become annoyingly popular).

Main problem, as usual, is that Android and iOS have become such big and popular "platforms" for mobile apps that establishing a "third" platform for app developers is basically impossible (also remember what happened to Windows Phone OS, they were late to the market and failed spectacularly to catch up. Of course in this case it's open source so it can grow regardless of user numbers, but still, it's hard to catch up when lots of great Android apps were already developed specifically for Android). So you can only hope that Android app compatibility grows mature enough to be close to 100% compatible, so that you can also run almost all Android apps on your mainline Linux mobile OS. Then you're not "limited" anymore. (At least if you consider it "limited" when you can't run Android apps. Which most probably consider to be "limited").

So I think it's less about the hardware and OS/UI (I think they work fine these days) and more about the available apps.

[My main daily driver phone is a GrapheneOS (Android) and I have a Pinephone with Linux for playing around in WiFi at home only]

[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

To your point, I tried for a bit and truly the one thing I couldn't live without was Signal.

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

The Signal Linux client isn't working on a phone?
Signal is also one of my essential apps, but I wasn't expecting a problem there, as I've Signal running on my desktop and laptop.
Phone just not beefy enough or what is the issue with it?

[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Flare? It's hardly complete. Can't even use it as a primary device.

As for the desktop app, it's not exactly mobile oriented.

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Ah, ok

Not being mobile oriented is a very valid point.
Thought, that it maybe still is enough to work with, but yeah, I can imagine that it's not really nice handle on mobile - and probably no notification support etc

[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Also the "desktop" web app requires to be paired with an instance of the mobile app.

I wished moxie would spend a little less time flying helicopters and trekking in Tajikistan, and reflect on the need to support non proprietary platforms.

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Ah, yeah right
Completely forgot about that

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
64 points (98.5% liked)

Linux

48375 readers
1658 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS