760
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 200ok@lemmy.world 213 points 1 week ago

Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer Kent Walker, says the DOJ is pushing “a radical interventionist agenda that would harm Americans and America’s global technology leadership.”

I'm honestly curious how this would "harm Americans".

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 104 points 1 week ago

Google pretending they have any other nationality other then “the global internet” is cute in a disgusting way.

[-] ladicius@lemmy.world 89 points 1 week ago

That statement is technically true.

The billionaire owners are Americans.

[-] Beldarofremulak@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Everyone really does need to have that at the forefront of their mind. When the C-suit, wall street, and politicians talk about "Americans" they aren't talking about us schlubs.

[-] Homescool@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

The corporations are people too!

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago

I refuse to call any Billionaires Americans. A billionaire in America has far more in common with a billionaire in Ireland or France than with working class Americans. They don't use our schools, drink our water, drive our roads, or rely on our safety nets. They don't take out the trash, do their laundry, wait 6 months for a doctor's appointment, or stress over defunding their retirement to pay for needed medication.

Billionaire involvement in politics should be considered foreign interference. Of course AIPAC is foreign interference too, but apparently that's not a problem either.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Alphabet’s Chief Legal Officer sounds like Donald Trump

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

I fear this is exactly who they're courting.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

It harms wealthy asshole Americans at Google.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago

The same ruling would ban Google from paying other browsers to make Google the default search engine.
This would kill Firefox and make Chromium the only browser engine that's left.

It would leave the newly-split-off chrome in the same financial situation as firefox. Arguably a worse one.

[-] penfore@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

That's really sad...

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

...a radical interventionist agenda...

That language seems very "Trump-esque", and I doubt it is a coincidence.

[-] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

How does chrome make money? It uses ads from Google, chrome on it's own is not a business.

Say you buy chrome, you have to options

  1. Ads built into chrome itself (when you're in the settings menu, homepage, reading a PDF, playing the dino game)

  2. Force your own default search engine, or get a company like Google or Bing to pay you for the privilege of being a default search engine.

Neither of these options are better than the status quo

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
760 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

59710 readers
1860 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS