727
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Stern@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

My point was concise and abundantly clear. I'm not sure how one could fail to understand how an employer won't do anything they're not compelled to do by law (As evidenced by the very existence of OSHA, for one.) which would include good faith negotiation with a union.

[-] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

My point was concise and abundantly clear.

I wasn't asking for your opinion of the clarity of your own post. All that's important in this conversation is that your point wasn't clear to me. If one is interested in continuing a conversation in good faith, then they would want to make sure that all parties involved are accurately following what's being said.

[-] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

I’m not sure how one could fail to understand how an employer won’t do anything they’re not compelled to do by law (As evidenced by the very existence of OSHA, for one.) which would include good faith negotiation with a union.

As long as the market is competitive and the agents involved are well-informed. Things like OSHA come in to play when the second requirement fails; if it is not possible for a consumer to make a well-informed purchase, then there should be reasonable protections in place for that consumer to make up for the deficiency.

this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
727 points (98.8% liked)

Political Weirdos

788 readers
160 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS