53
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2024
53 points (93.4% liked)
Lemmy.world Support
3212 readers
1 users here now
Lemmy.world Support
Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.
This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.
This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.
You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email report@lemmy.world (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.
Follow us for server news 🐘
Outages 🔥
https://status.lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Here's a link to the text of the legislation.
From what I understand they define it very broadly:
So basically everything Web 2.0 - ish that they haven't given an explicit exception to. Lemmy totally qualifies.
By those definitions any newspaper website with comments is social media. The sole purpose (or main purpose) of a Lemmy instance is to aggregate links, the comments are secondary (just like in newspaper websites). The definition is too vague and if you apply it to the letter it would include 99% of websites, even porn websites have comments these days.
We call them "link posts" and I think they may qualify as posts under this broad definition.
https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/osa2021154/s11.html
I think that is their intention
Well that clears things up...
Now they just need to define "social purposes".
They seem more concerned with making sure businesses won't have issues.
If retailers though they might have issues just because they let customers post product reviews there would have been a fell funded campaign against the legislation.