this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
311 points (96.1% liked)

196

17065 readers
1056 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

do evil games expect evil prizes, thank you Rainer Forst

edit: this is a pedagogical post, not a philosophical one. i actually fully agree with the paradox of tolerance and its conclusion! i just find that it doesn’t work as well as an educational tool for introducing people to the concept. sorry for any confusion :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Well... half an egg on my face for not reading it, half-kudos for getting it right anyway!:)))

Thank you for the truth! Sincerely!

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

i guess my meme was not clear lol. i fully agree with the paradox of tolerance and its conclusion. i just think the paradox as a tool for teaching people about the nuances of tolerance is ineffective in comparison to the social contract.

[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can certainly understand where you're coming from, reading the actual philosophical postulates feels like technobabble after a point. But that's philosophy, it really likes $20 words (and so do I, won't lie!:)) )

As for the layman, I think the "talk shit, get hit" rule is a better exemplifier. One would assume that most people understand what the aforementioned "shit" represents, maybe highlighting that Fashspeak is among the vilest examples of such would more easily contextualise it?

Genuinely wondering, I realise that while my intent to study philosophy was my own, the time and opportunities to do so have been a privilege.

[–] spujb@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

yeah i think that’s valid. something like a progression in a discussion as understanding increases wouldn’t be amiss i feel.

⬇️less understanding

  • talk (or do) shit, get hit
  • tolerance is like a contract
  • unlimited tolerance is impossible; enforcing universal tolerance leads to a paradoxical increase of intolerance

⬇️more understanding

[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Oooh, I love that, it lays everything out very neatly! I'll totally steal this progression next time this subject pops up!