...almost
this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
269 points (100.0% liked)
Chapotraphouse
14290 readers
927 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
In the other case, yeah, it is good propaganda. It's something great to stir revolutionary sentiment, truly. Honestly, myself, I'd like to see more. That's really it though. It's just a one-off event, perhaps with a couple copy-cats that result in nothing more than added security and bulletproof limousines. Countries in the exploited periphery still have yet to tear off their shackles despite their long history of direct-action. Left-wing urban guerillas in West Germany are a great example of this in the imperial core; they had plenty propaganda of the deed to draw people to their side and even enjoyed popular support. Without mass organization, however, they were unable to actually effect the conditions around them.
Those who engage in that form of practice in mass-organization successfully are culled. Fred Hampton, M.L.K, etc. Of course it isn't completely useless, it's called propaganda of the deed for a reason. It's that we have history to compare it to that shows us that ultimately it isn't much worth for change.
You're not going to be able to actually "change" anything without addressing the imperialism and the exploited periphery to deal with the labor aristocracy. What you can do is make an effect on your local community or build one, agitprop and engage in other forms of adventurism when you can. There are more effective things than shooting C.E.Os. I'd look towards the contamination of Israeli clean-rooms as an example of more effective sabotage.
A prerequisite to what? The 1800s era of propaganda of the deed? It was effective in stirring sentiment, sure, but it didn't accomplish anything compared to other examples I mentioned and to what I said.
I also personally think people who advocate for this type of risky direct action should be leading the example. As who of those that advocate organization; not everyone on here is just "not organizing".
i'd note there's probably kind of an inherent difference between propaganda of the deed in the 1800s and propaganda of the deed in 2024 where you can literally livestream it to millions
I agree. I mentioned earlier that sure, you get more spread and reach. On the other edge of the sword you have people way more comfortable and steeped into even deeper echo chambers and paradigms. Propaganda of the deed nowadays can reach millions and we've seen something like this before. Did it really inspire anything other than some people on the internet cheering for the next week? It isn't the first time an insurance CEO was iced in NYC.
Hegemony wasn't implanted as deep in the 1800s.
I can understand that. I think what I'm trying to say is that action generally is paralyzed in the core. It is dominated by a labor aristocracy that extracts and bleeds the periphery dry in order to maintain it's hegemony. Trying to bust through this requires recruiting from the most marginalized, oppressed and distraught in the core which typically are also affected by alienation and can have their own "views" if you can get what I mean.
If we had figured out the proper action, we'd be chilling in space discussing this over a bust of Marx and Lenin. Sadly, we're here. Truly, I think it's partially a waiting game with the rest dictated by how you organize with your local community that being your neighbors, your family, your friend's family, etc. Getting into an actual functional party around you is something for after you know who's around you and you can take the extra work and mental stress.
This "action" has been demonstrated in history countless times over. I have no doubt we'll see it pop up more and more. I also have no doubt that we'll know exactly where it ends.