676
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works to c/yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com

As per .world worldnews mod, no discussing naughty stuff like jury nullification.

While this post is blowing up, here's the book referenced by the shooter:

Delay Deny Defend - Why Insurance Companies Don't Pay Claims and What You Can Do About It

By request: Full, uncensored video of the shooting. (Fucking obviously NSFW)

Jury nullification: A practical FAQ

Do I have to answer questions about jury nullification?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 58 points 2 weeks ago

Hold the fuck up, now they have secret terms of service?

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 81 points 2 weeks ago

Based on past behaviour, the .world ToS generally gets modified to justify whatever actions they've taken AFTER they've already taken it.

[-] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 22 points 2 weeks ago

The lemmy.world terms of service are not exactly a work of clear legal craftmanship. I don't always think it's a bad thing to change the TOS to match this situation that just came up, so that we'll have a consistent policy written down that everyone's had time to look over. But it's clearly been thrown together by a bunch of amateurs who are, for some reason, cosplaying as a mini-Facebook with all the mode of speaking and fake professionalism that entails.

Read our Terms of Service carefully before using this website (“the website"). These Terms of Service ("the Terms of Service" or “the document”) govern your access to and use of the website. The website is available for your use only on the condition that you agree to the Terms of Service set forth above and below. If you do not agree with all of the Terms of Service, then do not access or use Lemmy.World. By accessing or using the website, you and the entity you are authorized to represent (“user” "you" or "your") signify your agreement to be bound by the Terms of Service.

That part sounds very lawyerly. Then the rest of the document is clearly a wiki that's been edited by a variety of volunteer admins as time goes on as different situations come up, with random pieces of general internet advice intermixed with what the rules of the site are, not clearly separated into which one is which.

Before using the website, remember you will be interacting with actual, real people and communities. Lemmy.World is not a place for you to attack other people or groups of people. Just because you disagree with someone doesn't give you the right to harass them. Discuss ideas and be critical of principles. Show the respect you desire to receive.

Everyone has a right to browse and interact with Lemmy.World and other federated instances free of harassment and/or threats of violence. Please try and be kind to your fellow human, or at least civil. Trolling users is only funny if both parties find it funny. Trolling mods and/or site admins is ill-advised.

Do not engage in content manipulation such as posting spam content, vote manipulation through using several user accounts or consistently down-voting a user. Vote for the content, not for the person.

Those are all good advice. Will I get banned for violating them? If I consistently downvote a user I don't like, or if I don't show the respect I desire to receive? Or if I'm trolling, and someone doesn't find it funny?

Do I just need to intuit that if I use multiple accounts to make fake downvotes, I'll be banned, but if I just consistently downvote another user when I see them, I won't be? The whole reason for having a TOS is so that users, and admins, won't need to intuit things like that.

Then there's this. Wait for the end, there's a punchline:

  1. Violent Content

No visual content depicting executions, murder, suicide, dismemberment, visible innards, excessive gore, or charred bodies. No content depicting, promoting or enabling animal abuse. No erotic or otherwise suggestive media or text content featuring depictions of rape, sexual assault, or non-consensual violence. All other violent content should be tagged NSFW.

6.1 War Footage

Any graphic war footage taken by either private individuals or media outlets is prohibited. Exceptions may be made for photos and videos of historical significance.

6.2 Violent Content (Exceptions)

Depictions, imagery or otherwise ancient artwork in any form, other publicly available media entertainment content depicting gore or sexual content may be excluded and allowed, as long as they are fair use, in the public domain, or tolerated by the copyright owner, and in compliance with our Content Policy, as well as all applicable laws and their local laws. For example, films depicting war or historical reenactments.

Well, that seems perfectly clear. Any graphic war footage is prohibited, except war footage. That's allowed.

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

It sounds lawyerly to a layman, but they’re defining lowercase words, which is not a thing (no offense intended). It looks like they tried to copy a legalistic style without understanding the point of writing in that style

[-] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 17 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah. It's imitating the form of a legal document for reasons of pure pretense.

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago

it sure as fuck ain't in it today, 5 dec 2024.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

First TOS is Star Trek. Second TOS is Terms Of Service.

[-] ochi_chernye@startrek.website 2 points 2 weeks ago

Third TOS candidates, hmmm.

  • Tears of the Sun
  • Tits-out Sunday
  • Turtle Ossification Syndrome
  • Telescoping Oscillating Syringe

Any number of possibilities, really!

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah its called whatever the fuck a mod wants to make up whenever the fuck they want to make it up. See some of the main mods in politics and world news.

this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
676 points (97.7% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

493 readers
249 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.

Rules

Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS