1361
submitted 3 weeks ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Reddit’s r/medicine moderators deleted a thread where doctors and users harshly criticized murdered UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.

Comments, including satirical rejections of insurance claims for gunshot wounds, targeted UHC’s reputation for denying care to boost profits.

Despite the removal, similar discussions continue, with medical professionals condemning UHC’s business practices under Thompson’s leadership, which a Senate report recently criticized for denying post-acute care.

Thompson, shot in what appears to be a targeted attack, led a company notorious for its high claim denial rates, fueling ongoing debates about corporate ethics in healthcare.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The one big difference I can think of is that Hitler's death did something. This guy here, he's a CEO. Was it morally acceptable for him to die? Sure, he caused thousands and thousands of deaths by his company leadership, after all. I'd prefer something else, but I won't miss him, either.. But sadly it only frees up a marginal portion of their wealth, and that wealth just goes to other rich assholes.

To take down the corrupt part, you have to get rid of the shareholders and moneygivers, which sadly are quite a few.

[-] Denidil@lemm.ee 21 points 2 weeks ago

Apparently it already has gotten another insurance company that had just announced a ghoulish coverage policy for anesthesia to reverse course.

[-] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Because they realise that they dont really have any power and people might be starting to see that again. The bubble might finally be bursting.

[-] inv3r510n@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

God I’ve been edged so hard for so long it’s about fucking time

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Silver linings

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 weeks ago

No, terrorism has a bad reputation because of media, but if these people were scared for their lives to do what they're doing then some of them would chose to not do it. It sucks that anyone ever feels the need to resort to terrorism, but it has historically worked a number of times to accomplish good things. It is an evil tool, as all violence is, but, as all tools, it does have a utility.

[-] EvilZ@thelemmy.club 3 points 2 weeks ago

Well....

If people knew they would be prosecuted and have their legacy tarnished and end up in jail they would think twice... These elites care about their legacy and image.

When there is a lack of accountability and watchdogs that actually hold power...

Imagine if insurance companies were made to pay up 300 millions in penalties but the reality is these people get away with it by getting a good lawyer and accountant.... This is where I get the the desire to shoot them...

[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

You don't know the consequences of this CEO's murder. Only a short time has passed. It may inspire a string of murders targeting unethical leaders scaring people from taking those positions and making unethical decisions or, perhaps, an entire revolution. Maybe it inspires nothing. It has definitely lead to some additional conversations, and I think that is a good start.

Murder is wrong. Punishment without trial is wrong. Denying critical benefits and putting people into crippling debt in search of profits is wrong. Someone did one wrong thing to stop other wrong things. We'll see where it leads.

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
1361 points (99.3% liked)

News

23659 readers
3091 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS