999
submitted 1 year ago by some_guy to c/news@lemmy.world

Surprising no one but the mgmt teams…

Unispace found that nearly half (42%) of companies with return-to-office mandates witnessed a higher level of employee attrition than they had anticipated. And almost a third (29%) of companies enforcing office returns are struggling with recruitment. In other words, employers knew the mandates would cause some attrition, but they weren’t ready for the serious problems that would result.

Meanwhile, a staggering 76% of employees stand ready to jump ship if their companies decide to pull the plug on flexible work schedules, according to the Greenhouse report. Moreover, employees from historically underrepresented groups are 22% more likely to consider other options if flexibility comes to an end.

In the SHED survey, the gravity of this situation becomes more evident. The survey equates the displeasure of shifting from a flexible work model to a traditional one to that of experiencing a 2% to 3% pay cut.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Pantoffel@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago

In Germany 3 months are standard, from both sides. It is a good thing, because they cannot just put you on the street by tomorrow, but have to pay for another three months. This goes vice versa. Is that any different in the states?

[-] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 year ago

In the united states, it is customary for a leaving employee to give 2 weeks notice, but a firing employer does not usually give any notice at all. They do just put you out on the street tomorrow.

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago

Also the 2 week notice is not actually required. It's just "best practice".

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That varies depending upon state law. California has the warn act which gives you some rights if you're let go as part of a large wave of layoffs.

[-] the_sisko@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago

Can't speak for the whole country but my employment is at-will, meaning it can be terminated by either side at any moment with no notice.

It is considered polite and relatively standard to give two weeks' notice prior to leaving your job, but there's no requirement in any of the jobs I've had.

Of course, employers don't have that same "polite standard" of two weeks, it's not unheard of for people to be fired on the spot. Though it's definitely unusual. For broader layoffs, it's pretty common to get several weeks of notice and pay.

[-] frankhorrigan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm in Canada, and typically an employee will give two weeks as a minimum, more in some circumstances. Employer's requirements vary by province, and may require notice or severance pay.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

California has the warn act which is supposed to mandate an employer to either provide notice or give 90 days compensation. It's not always followed and not always applicable, but it's similar to what you're talking about.

In our case it's slightly better for the employee though, because nobody can force you to continue working here. It's customary to give two weeks though, and that's generally followed so that you can use previous employers as a reference.

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
999 points (98.3% liked)

News

23665 readers
3635 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS