420

Body camera footage shows the moment an LMPD officer hands a woman in labor a citation for unlawful camping as she waits for an ambulance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago

Sen. Whitney Westerfield, a Republican from Fruit Hill who chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee, was one of the bill’s more vocal opponents. When he learned of the citation against a woman in labor, he called it “deplorable.”

A Republican showing compassion? Is that allowed?

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 hours ago

A Republican showing compassion? Is that allowed?

Next week they'll be calling him a RINO just wait.

It's enough for me to call him a RINO right now...

[-] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

It's only because she wasn't having a miscarriage

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's always a "Republicans shocked to discovery what they vocally campaigned on would come to pass" headline in-between election cycles.

[-] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

This Republican was a voice against it, however.

There is a minority of Republicans that have actual republican values and are being drowned out, similarly to the socialists within the democratic party.

Its rare to see one, they have to hide now, leaving the typical "Republican" as a far right soulless thing. But this might be an instance of it.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 hours ago

actual republican values

Actual Republican values are still deplorable. They are just more polite than what we've seen in recent years. The magats have done a great job of helping everyone to forget that R was never a friend to queer folks, minorities, women, nor anyone not white enough and Christian enough for them.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

It's also important to note that state parties are different from the national party - as an example Vermont Republican Governor Scott is pro-choice and supportive of trans rights... a lot of state politicians aren't there to grandstand and instead work to solve local problems. Now, that bullshit politicking has been making it's way more often to the state level so that is changing but it's usually good to read up on politicians at the state level.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Vermont Republican Governor Scott is pro-choice and supportive of trans rights…

That wasn't particularly uncommon back in the 80s/90s when "Pro-Life" was more of a regional religion moniker than a partisan brand. We had Texas Republicans like Kay Bailey Hutchinson who were Pro-Choice and Delaware Democrats like Joseph Robinette Biden who were Pro-Life. Same with Log Cabin Republicans and DOMA-voting Democrats, straight through the Bush Jr administration.

Scott's a classic "fiscally conservative, socially liberal" Republican that used to be all over the New England area a generation ago. He loves tax cuts for his buddies in business and private charity schemes that let philanthropists hog the limelight without obligating them to spend more than they feel like and small-government rhetoric that plays well with liberal libertarians. He'll sign bills that loosely mandate the purchase of private insurance and cap property taxes that fund local schools, but shies away from a truly public health care or higher education system.

it’s usually good to read up on politicians at the state level.

They've got different masters than their national counterparts. But you'll find just as many deplorables at the state level.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Not in Washington State, our r's are hot garbage.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah - WA GOP is fucking insane - they're basically just assholes that bought into the same bullshit that's thoroughly infected Idaho.

Man, Idaho is fucking scary.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago

I'll see both your WA and Idaho and raise you some NC GOP.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

It's really beautiful in some places too. But yeah, don't live in Idaho.

[-] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 18 hours ago

Definitely. Egregious lack of foresight they the police office didn't write two tickets. One for her and one for the child she was carrying. Life begins at conception so that fetus is as guilty as she is.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Lock it up! Lock it up!

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

A Republican talking about compassion while actually showing none is allowed, and actually encouraged.

[-] talentedkiwi@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Didn't read, Out of context comment, but he probably called the woman deplorable. 😂

this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
420 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19233 readers
2479 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS