this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
26 points (79.5% liked)

Linux

11486 readers
1396 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] addie@feddit.uk 35 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Finish the transition from X to Wayland?

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

I’m not a super-savvy user. Can someone explain to me why I should care about X vs Wayland? Everything seems to work with X, and as I’ve just read, many programs don’t support Wayland. So will this transition just lead to lots of broken software once someone decides they won’t ship with X by default anymore?

[–] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wayland is basically the direct successor to X11. It basically fixes tearing, makes HDR possible, makes scaling way better, and is all-round just better prepared for the future. I've been using it for years without much trouble. The only issues I keep having are scripts which expect x11-specific tools to be there, but that seems to be quickly solving itself while people realize that x11 is quickly loosing support. If you want to try it, I recommend setting up a fresh installation of a distro with KDE, Gnome, Sway, or Hyprland, just to make sure all the right dependencies are installed.

[–] SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net 9 points 1 year ago

Wayland is basically the direct successor to X11

Being pedantic. Wayland is a replacement not a successor. It's for those X does it, why not Wayland, situations.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)