Of course Bonerello is a fuck, but unpopular opinion in some spaces: the role of CEO is still necessary as an organizing function in a socialist society, just with obligations and interests in line with people. It's what a highly trained commissar needs to do, and that commissar will be a labourer who should be compensated for that labour, and maybe be compensated more insofar as that labour is very specialized and difficult. It seems China still sees that role existing in the foreseeable future.

But in the West now, they are just representatives of capitalist interests and doing useless labour (from any non-capitalist viewpoint) and fuck em

[–] Blottergrass@hexbear.net 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I mean none of this shit is ever gonna happen anyways. I've been alive 34 years and have never witnessed this fine-tuning of terms amounting to anything materially.

[–] MLRL_Commie@hexbear.net 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I don't understand how this is a response to me? Am I missing something? Edit: what I'm talking about it something that does exist, and has existed since the Soviet union, right? It has a material impact? This is just tangential to what the post is about, not a response or defense. I'm saying among comrades that we need to think seriouslu about the role, because AES is also.

But fuck CEO's in the West. They are bourgeois in interests and in every other meaningful way.

load more comments (4 replies)