1156
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 1 month ago

the degree of separation matters in my opinion, technically the insurance cannot prevent a patient from accessing healthcare, (in practice few have the money to pay out of pocket or fight a lawsuit with megacorps) health insurance never was about healthcare it's about insurance against costs associated with it.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It doesn't though. Whether they physically block you from getting care or put up financial blocks that they know will do the same, the outcome is the same and these layers of abstraction exist to make people like you ok with social murder.

The fact that your argument is based around it being somehow not murder when they implement policies they know will lead to death by not doing their one fucking job makes me so fucking sad.

[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

And yet when they don't cover "the costs associated with it", you'd still defend these insurance companies because it wasn't their responsibility to provide healthcare in the first place, right?

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Hard to believe you're a real person expressing these statements, no good faith in your positions... What are you, man? Who the fuck are you even fighting for?

this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
1156 points (97.2% liked)

Progressive Politics

1417 readers
1196 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS