[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

The victim's statement here ends with an oddly volunteered tangent and specific praise of driverless vehicles, before it finally takes an eerie turn in the last sentence...

"...With that said, I think the Human Factor in this issue is going to be a lot harder to solve than anything else.” ....FREEZE CITIZEN!

I do hope she's okay, and those two folks seem to be clowns, but this thing also all reads as likely guerilla marketing for Waymo - who the article informs me, in a very capitalism-friendly turn of events, that they now have their service open to the public in 3 cities, cars have a safety feature that checked in with her multiple times and they "rewarded" her with an extra ride. It's a light enough "crime", with a very engineered feeling and enough to feel "real" while providing ready fodder for morning radio talk shows, Jimmy Fallon and good morning America talking heads to drone on about this morning across America as time filler that quietly advertises waymo "saving" a person from the scary outside world.

Note: Also, was very funny that throughout drafting my comment here "waymo" was constantly being autocorrected to "say no" :)

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Competitive failure race between trump and musk.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

A.k.a. Twitter and the elon filtering moment

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

What if every company did something?

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Ghoulish non-lawyer and cousin fucker, rudy guilianni farted on a woman in court.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Can the space man make port?

173
Uncanny... (lemmy.world)
354
Pick one (lemmy.world)
192
Iconic (lemmy.world)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 177 points 2 months ago

"Trad wives" outraged at being treated like traditional wives.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 154 points 2 months ago

Spread this far and wide

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 271 points 2 months ago
2
submitted 3 months ago by Snapz@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
18
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Snapz@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

I heard a person call into a show the other day, voice only, and talk about some poor working conditions at a factory. Made me think about how it would probably be so easy for nefarious bosses to be able to identify that person through voice recognition SW with all of the data that comes from us looking directly into cameras and speaking clearly in modern workplace meetings.

Do "anonymous" callers need to start using voice modulation software for these kinds of calls in the modern world?

158
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Snapz@lemmy.world to c/reddit@lemmy.world

As a little background, I didn't actively use Reddit for months following the blackout. I still barely stop in over there and if I do I'm never logged in our contributing to the communities there (where I was previously a daily poster/commenter).

Just bringing up a point that I'm not sure I'd seen anyone discussing directly over here; the general sentiment and quality of posted information on Reddit has become tangibly worse in multiple ways (I think coinciding with this group, us, leaving).

Now don't get me wrong, Reddit sucked in many ways and for long before the migrations to Lemmy, but there is a noticeable difference in a few key areas:

  1. Less skepticism in replies

  2. Less sourcing of information in posts and replies

  3. Less counter positions expressed generally

  4. If there is a decent reply, you have to scroll much further down to find it

  5. Less plain labeling of obvious bullshit

Many of us used to introduce counter viewpoints or clarifying information into posts, with sources. That functionally worked as a roadblock to stall the quickly building momentum of disinformation/misinformation. Those roadblocks often feel absent over there now, IMO.

Not saying we hold a responsibility to go back there or that we were saving lives before, but the difference is very apparent to me - Have you seen it? Any examples?

208
submitted 6 months ago by Snapz@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
43
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Snapz@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Assuming to artificially secure people with new memberships through their first 4-6 weeks to establish a habit through the first billing cycle. Is this a known thing?

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 191 points 8 months ago

They'll take away volume control (SW/HW buttons) and replace with dynamically adjusting "magic volume" so that you can't mute ads.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 213 points 9 months ago

Everyone, stop staying "duh" to research outcomes. Research takes time to design, fund, run and analyze and it's purpose is to scientifically prove something we all "felt" a while ago.

Our feelings don't mean too much because they are often wrong, data backed fact means something. Start being happy about these validation posts and hold off on the pickachu face memes.

40
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by Snapz@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

Through the great depression...

When 9/11 happened...

The 2008 housing crash...

COVID...

On a smaller scale, when the Titanic sank, I'm assuming someone inevitably got rich from the aftermath somehow?

Who are the people/groups that make up history's must successful parasites? Who "came out on top" in each instance of historical human suffering?

3
submitted 11 months ago by Snapz@lemmy.world to c/chargers@sh.itjust.works

The rest of them all look good, but Addison just looks like a professional ball player out the gate.

8
submitted 11 months ago by Snapz@lemmy.world to c/chargers@sh.itjust.works
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 169 points 1 year ago

Some of the worst people I've worked with are "burners".

There's apparently a private jet at burning man this year that was taking off and landing constantly so that people could fuck on the jet - it's fall of Rome style excess in a broken world where most people's basic needs are not met on an enormous scale.

Your statement is fairly tone deaf to the basic objective reality of the "party", OP. The frustrated people at the bottom are feeling a bit of catharsis in the money burning factory closing for a day while they starve and watch.

43
submitted 1 year ago by Snapz@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

So obviously we're all on Lemmy for a complicated combination of reasons, but we all likely share some common ground, namely...

  • need for privacy
  • need to own/control/access the data we produce
  • healthy skepticism about the trustworthiness of for-profit corporations, in general

So if we don't want meta to know even innocuous things; like how many times/when we message our grandma, and we don't google to know when we're searching for remedies to a rash, and we don't want reddit to... Well we just don't want reddit - we don't want them to profit from or weaponize that data against us in a myriad ways.

We also don't want them artificially removing features and creating tiered layers of service/value hidden behind a paywall (I understand this is very present in the some of the commercially available DNA services).

So that brings me to DNA testing services. Since they started to emerge in the mainstream they were immediately an interesting, exciting novelty and I also knew it was data I wouldn't feel safe trusting with a for-profit org - with broken systems like law enforcement and health insurers on speed dial and just salivating for the goodies they collect.

So all that considered, any groups that provide this type of service that you do trust/use, and why?

view more: next ›

Snapz

joined 1 year ago