975

"And so I come full circle on this response and just want to encourage you with some substance that we are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be," he said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Paragone@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

Like Hitler's "Krystalnacht", right?

JUST like Hitler's "night of broken-glass"??


US has a blanket-policy, that they NEVER bargain with terrorists: once you "appease" 1 of them, then the ALL are certain of their terrorism's "rights".

US's policy is simply to break them.

Nonfatally if possible, but there's no moral/ideological problem with killing them.


The US .. I expect only 1/3rd of the US's population to be left alive, after US Civil War Part2, & the ever-escalating ClimatePunctuation has finished trashing things, these next years..

When ww3 begins, the ContinuousHammerfall stage of The Great Filter ( 2035-ish ), I expect not 400,000,000 citizens in the US, but 4/3 hundred-million citizens left alive.

133,000,000-ish.

Maybe the remnant left alive will understand the stakes, then..

as I'm "sure" the rest of the world will, by then ( not a chance in hell, iow ).


Socio-political-pressure NEVER kept humankind honest.

Not in the old-testament, not in the new-testament, not in the mahabharata, not in the buddhist, or shinto, ar any records.

IF humankind survives The Great Filter, THEN objectivity is going to be LAW among the survivors, however few they are.

_ /\ _

[-] cantw8togo@midwest.social 7 points 6 days ago

Sounds a lot like Putin talking to Ukraine

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 181 points 1 week ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago

It's as true now as it was when Markos Moulitas wrote it in 2008: IOKIYAR

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 153 points 1 week ago
[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 79 points 1 week ago

The terrifying thing is that a sizable portion of this country reads this list and thinks it sounds like a great idea.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago

Some of it. I don't know that even a sizable portion of this country wants to raise prescription drug prices. I also think a very small percentage wants to get rid of no fault divorce or contraception. Even most Catholics are fine with contraception. And use it too.

Raising the retirement age? I'd guess that their sizable voting bloc in their 60s wouldn't be good with that.

Honestly, I think the more people learn about this, the more they will find things they don't like about it. Even Republicans.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago

Even Republicans

Yeah, but they mean all that for other people, not me!

...hey, what's that leopard staring at me for?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] scops@reddthat.com 40 points 1 week ago

I'm surprised this graphic doesn't mention banning porn and jailing those who produce and distribute it (page 5). Even for non-porn consumers, when you remember that they're trying to lump non-explicit LGBT media in as porn (for example), that becomes a pretty dangerous stance.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 132 points 1 week ago

If you resist our violence, there will be more violence.

[-] psvrh@lemmy.ca 114 points 1 week ago

When someone tells you you that they're planning Night of the Long Knives, you should believe them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 97 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Glad Project 2025 is becoming public knowledge, it's not hyperbole, people really are going to die if Trump is re-elected. That's not a threat, that's an acknowledgement of what the GOP plans to do.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] newtraditionalists@kbin.melroy.org 78 points 1 week ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Do you all remember how quickly they backed down as soon as ashley babbit was shot? (yes I know I spelled it wrong, I don't care to honor that piece of trash). A whole crowd of these fuckers. and presumably the most rabid of them, their infantry if you will. These are the cultists who spent money, time, and energy to be there. So they are also the ones with means. Also, presumably a bunch of them were carrying concealed weapons. Then one person gets shot and the entire thing crumbles. Cowards. Through and through cowards. And they think they can win a war?

[-] thisbenzingring 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The reaction of everyone when the shot is fired was absolutely telling. The coward that was right next to her turns and ran. Didn't even help her or charge an attack with the absolutely massive numbers they had. They were there, at the heart of it all and they turned around and ran because the violence became real and was directed at them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] JPSound@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago

They forget how many of us gun owning liberals there are. They think they can bully everyone around because they think they own all the guns thus the upper hand. They're are far too dense to realize they're entirely wrong. We just don't make it our entire personality. I don't feel the need to put my guns on display to prove to people I don't even know what a MaNlY rUgGeD BaDaSs I am. That's not why i own them. I very much enjoy the sport and technical knowledge and focus required to hit the target in different situations. I want to be perceived as a loving husband and a kind and honorable man and friend. Those two things are at odds. Or maybe I'm just not insecure about my masculinity.

[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago

I have been staunchly anti-gun personally, but it feels like it's time to arm myself. The threats are becoming credible.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Schadrach 65 points 1 week ago

The best part of that line is that everyone left of fascism reads it as a direct threat - bow to our will or there will be blood, while the right can claim it's just them worrying about the left turning violent.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Monument 52 points 1 week ago

lol. They want folks to step aside so they can seize power and then use that power to subjugate the people they’re threatening violence against. But, you know, later it’ll be institutional violence.

Those fuckers deserve a drink. A Molotov Cocktail.
Heh. “On the house!”

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago

I know it's meant to be a threat, but he really makes it sound like he's at our mercy. It will only be bloodless if WE allow it.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago

Bring it. I’m ready. You snowflakes don’t have the faith, conviction or cojones to follow through with your threats, which is why you make so many of them, and why they get more and more violent as you see them be less and less effective. Calling your bluff, but I’ll be ready to slap you right back into the hole you crawled out of.

load more comments (28 replies)
[-] dojan@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

I mean they promise violence if they get their shit through so the only option is to challenge them.

[-] demizerone@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

This man is a coward. He wants other people to do the dirty work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pyrflie@lemm.ee 38 points 1 week ago

Who isn't expecting violence in November?

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

More people should know what's in Project 2025. It's a guide to creating a Judge Dredd universe, where the only people living in it will be the Super Rich and the Super F*cking Poor.

They're not even trying to hide it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] raynethackery@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

Why is he not under arrest for incitement to violence?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
975 points (98.4% liked)

News

21821 readers
5295 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS