this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
73 points (96.2% liked)

[Migrated, see pinned post] Casual Conversation

3369 readers
2 users here now

We moved to !casualconversation@piefed.social please look for https://lemm.ee/post/66060114 in your instance search bar

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (e.g. politics or societal debates).
  4. Stay calm: Don’t post angry or to vent or complain. We are a place where everyone can forget about their everyday or not so everyday worries for a moment. Venting, complaining, or posting from a place of anger or resentment doesn't fit the atmosphere we try to foster at all. Feel free to post those on !goodoffmychest@lemmy.world
  5. Keep it clean and SFW
  6. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was listening to the New Year's Day concert by the Vienna philharmonic and wondered who one of the composers was so used a popular song recognition app. (I expected it would make some fuzzy match on the piece and give me the name + composer). To my amazement it did give the name and composer but as played by the Vienna philharmonic in 2005 in the same location. The orchestra does not have the same members as 19 years ago, nor was it the same conductor, so it seemed the piece was matched on the acoustics of the Musikverein where they were playing, which I found astonishing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Video generators are cool as fuck and I refuse to pretend otherwise. You can tell a robot "make this look more Pixar" and it works. Even if what you feed in is a block of solid noise. Yeah yeah yeah, sometimes you get six-legged dogs who are walking both ways at once, but even those amusing failure cases exist in photorealistic forests pulled from thin air.

This is science fiction technology, and you're mad at it because of... copyright?

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Knives are cool tech until you stab someone. People are less worried about the LLMs than they are about the stabby bits, like expropriation of others' work.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah they sure seem worried about intellectual property in this specific context and literally nowhere else. Can't have the robot learn English from library books. That's stealin' knowledge.

We expect an artist-program to know what 'more Pixar' means without seeing any Pixar!