this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
36 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

871 readers
127 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Shaggy0291@lemmygrad.ml
GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml
SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml
QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml
yogthos@lemmygrad.ml
36
Questions about the Sino-Soviet split (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 1 month ago by SovietReporter@lemmygrad.ml to c/asklemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Isn’t the worst socialism still better than the best capitalism? Why try to destroy “revisionist” socialism when you have capitalism to destroy? Wouldn’t it be easier to fix a revisionist socialist country than trying to convince a capitalist one to be socialist?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml -2 points 1 month ago

Revisionist aren't "bad" socialists, they are Liberals. What makes an idea revisionist is if it will reverse the progress of socialism and reinstate liberalism. Revisionists are more dangerous than liberals because they twist socialist language and ideas into supporting liberalism. They have negative revolutionary potential.