this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
326 points (79.1% liked)

Comic Strips

13584 readers
2710 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] mogoh@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 21 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] TIN@feddit.uk 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That's not an argument, it's just contradiction

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If that's from monty python then you are right. Marvelous piece.

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
  1. No it isn't.
  2. No I'm not.
  3. No it isn't.

(yes to all three, actually)

[–] azantis@ani.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

I see what you did there

[–] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 2 points 3 weeks ago

We've been over this already.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago

Oh yeah? Where is your proof?

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Oh man there was an entire south park episode about this...

Even triggering arguments to build up hype on socials. Can't find the episode, but it mentioned arguing or disagreeing with someone while aiming for a 3rd person to jump in overreacting and it spreads.

Edit: found it

Season 20 finale, 2010, featuring Elon musk...

https://southpark.fandom.com/wiki/The_End_of_Serialization_as_We_Know_It/Script

It's a way in which one person can create a massive reaction on the Internet. Look, person A trolls person B, but it's not about person B, the troll is trying to push buttons to try and get a reaction from hundreds, eventually creating person C, whose overreaction and self righteousness will elicit a reaction from persons D through F, who weren't trolls but can't help rip on person C.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

what about it?

[–] azantis@ani.social 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This curiously says a lot about our current social sphere.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] azantis@ani.social 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Like it's all just a ego contest and in the end it doesn't really matter who's right and who's wrong, in the end all that matters is that one or the other will get enough social pressure to make the other one shut up.

In this day and age, people argue over everything from the most basic stuff all the way to the most ridiculous stuff

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

is that in the comic though or are you projecting your existing opinion on the vague topic of online arguments? does the comic say all arguments are bad? I is discussing the offensiveness of a joke bad? is it bad when to many people argue at once?

doesn't seem like there's much of anything deeper than "what's the deal with airline food?" type material that expects the audience to make the statement in their mind than actually saying anything itself.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 1 points 3 weeks ago

It's in the comic, when viewed from a particular context. All meaning is relative to the context in which it is created, and in which it is perceived.

For what it's worth, I interpreted the comment similarly to the person you're replying to.