this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
100 points (97.2% liked)

El Chisme

322 readers
10 users here now

Place for posting about the dumb shit public figures say.

Rules:

Rule 1: The subject of a post must be a public person.

Rule 2: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 3: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 4: No sectarianism.

Rule 5: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 6: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 7: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 8: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blame@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i thought it was the 2008 election that made his career

[–] ChestRockwell@hexbear.net 28 points 1 month ago (2 children)

2012 he called every state right and was the one saying that Republicans were being idiots "unskewing" the polls.

2016 he was the least wrong (gave Trump 30ish% odds on election day when NYT gave Trump 1%). Indeed he was "right" in the constant drumbeat on the podcast about probability (source: I listened) and Harry Enten also gets some credit there basically saying trump had the same odds as a NFL kicker hitting a FG from 50 something yards out.

Ironically, 2012 (the easier one) is the one that most libs coast him on even when 2016 was honestly more impressive imo.

[–] MarmiteLover123@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

He also got 2024 kind of right, saying Harris and Trump were tied statistically, but that his gut feeling said that Trump would win.

His analysis is actually quite good, it's just that he's an insufferable dork with terrible opinions outside of it. That is also true of many "experts" though.

[–] ChestRockwell@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

Yeah. When Nate is just crunching numbers like the gambler he is, he's actually a solid source.

As soon as you move past numbers to why some policy might be good or not, that's when he's total trash.

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

That saddest part about this is that I got the same answer based on reading the temperature of my family and friends and just doing a gut check. Much less work.

[–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

08 was what created his career tho. 12 just cemented it

[–] dannoffs@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

He definitely had some prominence after 08 but I'd say it wasn't until 16 when he was the only liberal to not say it would be a sweep for Hillary that he could just coast for the rest of his life.