Snubbing bluesky is a great way to get people to not take you seriously. When you're making a recruitment thing like this you need to remember you're trying to draw in people who don't fully agree with you.

[–] secret300 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bluesky isn't federated as much as they pretend to be and say "they're working on it"

It's just another corporate social platform that will fall into the same thing

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Psst, OP included Signal in this post which isn't federated at all, so the argument of Bluesky not being "federated as much as they pretend to" is a bit irrelevant.

[–] secret300 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ye no shit but I replied to a comment not the post. There's already 5 comments saying that

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Things I've learned: the people in this community hate bluesky on principle, their principles are insular and toxic, and they can't read.

This is why people aren't going to mastadon more than Bluesky; because y'all're insufferable. I made the comment in context of the post, so why would you ignore it?

[–] secret300 1 points 2 hours ago

Okay my bad let me make another comment saying

"Signal isn't federated"

There happy?

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They use a different protocol from the "fediverse".

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The fact that you or anyone thinks that matters is part of the problem. Not every federated site needs to be federated with every other federated site. That's half the point of federation.

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 1 points 18 minutes ago

The post says "fediverse" which by its very name implies they are all interconnected.